Skip to content

measurability for tuples #1618

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

affeldt-aist
Copy link
Member

  • the set of tuples is measurable
  • tnth, cons, behead are measurable functions
Motivation for this change

This PR extracts from PR #1240 (Bernoulli sampling) lemmas of general interest about
the measurability of the set of tuples and of basic tuple operations. They are useful to
deal with vectors of random variables. It would help the rebase of PR #1240 to have them
in master beforehand and might be useful for other purposes.

@hoheinzollern @CohenCyril @proux01 @t6s

Checklist
  • added corresponding entries in CHANGELOG_UNRELEASED.md
  • added corresponding documentation in the headers

Reference: How to document

Merge policy

As a rule of thumb:

  • PRs with several commits that make sense individually and that
    all compile are preferentially merged into master.
  • PRs with disorganized commits are very likely to be squash-rebased.
Reminder to reviewers

- the set of tuples is measurable
- tnth, cons, behead are measurable functions

Co-authored-by: Alessandro Bruni <brun@itu.dk>
Co-authored-by: Cyril Cohen <cohen@crans.org>
Co-authored-by: Pierre Roux <pierre.roux@onera.fr>
Co-authored-by: Takafumi Saikawa <tscompor@gmail.com>
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist added this to the 1.12.0 milestone May 12, 2025
@affeldt-aist affeldt-aist added the enhancement ✨ This issue/PR is about adding new features enhancing the library label May 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement ✨ This issue/PR is about adding new features enhancing the library
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants