-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 375
Add distributions page #2907
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add distributions page #2907
Conversation
frameworks = ["Helmfile", "Helm", "Kubernetes"] | ||
licence = "Apache-2.0" | ||
repository = "https://gitlab.opencode.de/bmi/opendesk" | ||
support_level = "Commercial" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we add a link to where people can get commercial support?
@AmandineLP @bluesomewhere should the Foundation list all commercial distributions, or only its members / partners?
If we list all, should we add a distinctive badge for the ones supporting the Foundation and rank them higher? Hide those who don't by default, and display them when the user clicks on "expand"?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Both are not issues specific to only distros, are they?
Perhaps it makes sense to replace support_level
by commercial_support
. I.e. community support is done via public repo or chat, we already have the capability to show that. If set, the link contained in commercial_support
would spawn a "commercial support" button.
Can we continue without blocking on this, e.g. by not indicating anything for now? I have updated the openDesk entry to specify CE and checked BuM which seemed to have wrong info (one more reason to link to the actual support offer ;) ), so everything is now community-supported.
Here is what commercial support links would be like:
Still, I generally like the idea to draw the circle from the ecosystem category to the members page. Put a little star sticker on those projects which are Foundation members. 🌟
Signed-off-by: HarHarLinks <2803622+HarHarLinks@users.noreply.github.com>
Deploying matrix-website with
|
Latest commit: |
a20a7a4
|
Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
Preview URL: | https://1321b1a1.matrix-website.pages.dev |
Branch Preview URL: | https://add-distributions-page.matrix-website.pages.dev |
Signed-off-by: HarHarLinks <2803622+HarHarLinks@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: HarHarLinks <2803622+HarHarLinks@users.noreply.github.com>
{% if not distribution.matrix_standard %} | ||
<div class="standard" title="This distro might not be entirely compatible with standard Matrix apps.">!</div> | ||
{% endif %} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesnt seem very accessible and hard to discover
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From the weekly:
- Probably have it not only on hover
- We need to explain where we draw the line so its clear to the users
🎩 Website & Content WG
Fixes #2068. Based on #2182.
Signed-off-by: HarHarLinks 2803622+HarHarLinks@users.noreply.github.com
✔️ Checklist
<>
to linkify them (learn more).[label](@/target.md)
syntax./blog
page, especially for multiple posts on the same day. Prefer UTC format, e.g.2025-12-01T14:00:00Z
for Dec 1st, 2025, 2pm UTC.