Skip to content

Conversation

@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor

Parallelize Sources Jar Resolution to improve performance.


PR created automatically by Jules for task 16280572651889426613 started by @menny

💡 What:
- Refactored `GraphMemoizator` to use `ConcurrentHashMap` and `computeIfAbsent` for thread-safe caching.
- Updated `SourcesJarLocator` to use `parallelStream()` for fetching source jars.
- Replaced `HashMap` with `ConcurrentHashMap` in `SourcesJarLocator` to support concurrent access.

🎯 Why:
- `SourcesJarLocator` performs network I/O (HEAD requests) to check for the existence of source jars. Doing this sequentially for large dependency graphs is a major bottleneck.
- Parallelizing this operation significantly reduces the total time required to resolve source jars.

📊 Impact:
- Faster resolution of source jars for projects with many dependencies.
- Thread-safe caching mechanism in `GraphMemoizator`.

🔬 Measurement:
- Verified with `bazel test //resolver:sources_locator_test`.
- Thread safety ensured by `ConcurrentHashMap` and atomic `computeIfAbsent`.
@google-labs-jules
Copy link
Contributor Author

👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request.

When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down.

I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job!

For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with @jules. You can find this option in the Pull Request section of your global Jules UI settings. You can always switch back!


For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task.

New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants