Skip to content

Conversation

pull[bot]
Copy link

@pull pull bot commented Jan 27, 2020

See Commits and Changes for more details.


Created by pull[bot]

Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )

@pull pull bot added the ⤵️ pull label Jan 27, 2020
@pull pull bot added the merge-conflict Resolve conflicts manually label Feb 19, 2020
WillAyd and others added 28 commits June 9, 2023 09:17
Added select example to numpy user docs
Update README-quick-start.md
Updated Windows `base` Computations to be Safer
The existing documentation states that the behavior of slicing is the same as
in NumPy except when `step < -1`, implying that the behavior is the same when
`step = -1`. But this is not true:

In [1]: import numpy as np

In [2]: x = np.arange(10)

In [3]: x[2 : 5 : -1]  # Analogous slice in `ndarray`: `array![4, 3, 2]`
Out[3]: array([], dtype=int32)

In [4]: x[5 : 2 : -1]  # Analogous slice in `ndarray`: `array![]`
Out[4]: array([5, 4, 3])

So `step < -1` should be replaced by `step < 0` in the documentation.

There are some further differences in slicing behavior with negative step,
having to do with the default values for `start` and `end`:

In [5]: x[: 7 : -1]  # Analogous slice in `ndarray`: `array![6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0]`
Out[5]: array([9, 8])

In [6]: x[7 : : -1]  # Analogous slice in `ndarray`: `array![9, 8, 7]`
Out[6]: array([7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0])
Fix comparison with NumPy of slicing with negative step
In `fill()` and in `assign()`.
akern40 and others added 30 commits December 19, 2024 21:28
* Makes use of the nightly `doc_cfg` feature to automatically mark feature-gated items as requiring that feature.

This is possible thanks to the fact that docs.rs runs on nightly. While this may not be stabilized (and therefore may eventually reverse), I think it's extremely useful to users and only requires small additional configurations that would be easy to remove in the future.

* Adds appropriate arguments to CI/CD and removes serde-1, test, and docs features

* Fixes clippy complaining about `return None` instead of question marks
* Tries to stabilize MSRV CI/CD.

With the new MSRV-aware resolver available, I am trying to stabilize
our CI/CD, which frequently breaks due to dependency updates.
This takes three steps to do so:

1. Add Cargo.lock, so that builds on the CI/CD are deterministic
2. Add a regular (weekly) job that checks against the latest dependencies
across both stable and MSRV versions of rustc
3. Simplify the current CI/CD and revert to a single MSRV,
rather than using a BLAS-specific MSRV.
Uses the implementations from `Array1` and `Array2`, tests found in `crates/blas-tests/tests/dyn.rs`.
See #1440 for more information, especially [this comment](#1440 (comment)).
Also runs latest-deps CI when someone changes the latest-deps.yaml configuration
Adds a Numpy-equivalent `meshgrid` function
Also adds an accelerate option to the blas-tests crate
* add test case for empty array

* return early when the array has zero lenth dims

---------

Co-authored-by: Adam Kern <akern40@gmail.com>
---------

Co-authored-by: Adam Kern <akern40@gmail.com>
* draft for inplace reverse, permute

* add test cases

* formatter

* cycle detection logic with bitmask

* formatter

* satisfying CI(cargo doc, etc.)

* add comments from doc, to describe how the logic works
These allow the iterators to act on the lifetime of the data, not the lifetime of the view.
Specifically, deals with CVE-2025-4574, GHSA-4fcv-w3qc-ppgg, and GHSA-255r-3prx-mf99 by updating the lockfile and one set of dependencies for testing serialization.
Simple update, just an edition change in Cargo.toml and a run of `cargo update` with an MSRV-aware resolver.
* Fixes some broken references in the docs

* Raise allowable epsilon errors on logspace and geomspace

For some reason, when Miri runs, we get higher floating point error on these methods.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⤵️ pull merge-conflict Resolve conflicts manually
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.