Skip to content

Conversation

ryanrupp
Copy link
Contributor

@ryanrupp ryanrupp commented Nov 22, 2024

Note while most users will likely already have their managed version of Jackson provided, this at least makes it for users who don't explicitly include Jackson then use a newer patch version (instead of the release candidate). Also aligns the jackson-annotations version. Didn't push the minor version forward because allow for the downstream consumer to decide what Jackson version they want as much as possible i.e. they can push it forward rather than forcing the dependency/avoid programming against newer Jackson minor features.

Note while most users will likely already have their managed version of Jackson provided, this at least makes it for users who don't explicitly include Jackson then use a newer patch version (instead of the release candidate). Also aligns the jackson-annotations version. Didn't push the minor version forward because allow for the downstream consumer to decide what Jackson version they want as much as possible i.e. they can push it forward rather than forcing the dependency/avoid programming against newer Jackson minor features.
@ryanrupp ryanrupp force-pushed the update-jackson-version branch from 893ff7f to ec71665 Compare November 22, 2024 19:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant