Add refs to a few open datasets

inst/assets/bibliography.bib

@@ -3068,3 +3068,24 @@ @article{Robinson2010
    url = {https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25},
    year = {2010}
 }
+
+@article{Gamboa-Tuz2025,
+  author = {Gamboa-Tuz, Samuel D. and Ramos, Marcel and Franzosa, Eric and Huttenhower, Curtis and Segata, Nicola and Oh, Sehyun and Waldron, Levi},
+  title = {Commonly used compositional data analysis implementations are not advantageous in microbial differential abundance analyses benchmarked against biological        ▎ ground truth},
+  elocation-id = {2025.02.13.638109},
+  year = {2025},
+  doi = {10.1101/2025.02.13.638109},
+  publisher = {Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory},
+  abstract = {Previous benchmarking of differential abundance (DA) analysis methods in microbiome studies have employed synthetic data, simulations, and {\textquotedb       ▎ lleft}real data{\textquotedblright} examples, but to the best of our knowledge, none have yet employed experimental data with known {\textquotedblleft}ground truth{       ▎ \textquotedblright} differential abundance. A key debate in the field centers on whether compositional methods are necessary for DA analysis, which is challenging t       ▎ o answer due to the lack of ground truth data. To address this gap, we created the Bioconductor data package MicrobiomeBenchmarkData, featuring three microbiome dat       ▎ asets with established biological ground truths: 1) diverse oral microbiomes from supragingival and subgingival plaques, expected to favor aerobic and anaerobic bac       ▎ teria, respectively, 2) low-diversity microbiomes from healthy vaginas and bacterial vaginosis, conditions that have been well-characterized through cell culture an       ▎ d microscopy, and 3) a spike-in dataset with constant, known absolute abundances of three bacteria. We benchmarked 17 DA approaches and demonstrated that compositio       ▎ nal DA methods are not beneficial but rather lack sensitivity, show increased variability in constant-abundance spike-ins, and, most surprisingly, more frequently p       ▎ roduce paradoxical results with DA in the wrong direction for the low-diversity microbiome. Conversely, commonly used methods in microbiome literature, such as LEfS       ▎ e, the Wilcoxon test, and RNA-seq-derived methods, performed best. We conclude that researchers continue using widely adopted non-parametric or RNA-seq DA methods a       ▎ nd that further development of compositional methods includes benchmarking against datasets with known biological ground truth.Competing Interest StatementThe autho       ▎ rs have declared no competing interest.},
+  URL = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/02/17/2025.02.13.638109},
+  eprint = {https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2025/02/17/2025.02.13.638109.full.pdf},
+  journal = {bioRxiv}
+}
+
+@manual{HMP2data,
+  author = {Stansfield, John and Smirnova, Ekaterina and Zhao, Ni and Fettweis, Jennifer and Waldron, Levi and Dozmorov, Mikhail},
+  title = {{HMP2data}: 16s rRNA sequencing data from the Human Microbiome Project 2},
+  year = {2025},
+  note = {R package version 1.22.0},
+  doi = {10.18129/B9.bioc.HMP2Data}
+}

inst/pages/import.qmd

@@ -525,6 +525,21 @@ sequencing data, all processed using the same pipeline and reference
 database. For more use examples in R/Bioconductor, see the 
 [MicroBioMap vignette](https://blekhmanlab.github.io/MicroBioMap/articles/overview.html).
 
+### Integrative human microbiome project
+
+Datasets from the second phase of the human microbiome project, also known as
+integrative human microbiome project are made available with `r BiocStyle::Biocpkg("HMP2Data")`[@HMP2data].
+The datasets are offered as `TreeSE` objects. Additional data, *e.g.* cytokines,
+is included when available.
+
+### Microbiome benchmark data
+
+The `r BiocStyle::Biocpkg("MicrobiomeBenchmarkData")` allows access to datasets
+with some groundtruth available[@Gamboa-Tuz2025]. These datasets are compiled for the purpose of
+benchmarking differential abundance methods, but the ground truth may be useful
+for other benchmarking applications. Datasets are offered directily as `TreeSE`
+objects.
+
 ### Other data sources
 
 The current collections provide access to vast microbiome data