-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 659
Issue implicit any in JS files on widened inferred types from initializers in binding patterns #1064
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
jakebailey
merged 3 commits into
microsoft:main
from
Andarist:fix/issue-implicit-any-widening-binding-patterns
Jul 1, 2025
Merged
Issue implicit any in JS files on widened inferred types from initializers in binding patterns #1064
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
c7bf9a2
Issue implicit any in JS files on widened inferred types from initial…
Andarist 53ed7bf
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into fix/issue-implicit-an…
Andarist ffaebde
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into fix/issue-implicit-an…
Andarist File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
49 changes: 49 additions & 0 deletions
49
...eference/submodule/conformance/destructuringParameterDeclaration9(strict=true).errors.txt
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ | ||
index.js(15,9): error TS7031: Binding element 'json' implicitly has an 'any[]' type. | ||
|
||
|
||
==== index.js (1 errors) ==== | ||
/** | ||
* @param {Object} [config] | ||
* @param {Partial<Record<'json' | 'jsonc' | 'json5', string[]>>} [config.additionalFiles] | ||
*/ | ||
export function prepareConfig({ | ||
additionalFiles: { | ||
json = [] | ||
} = {} | ||
} = {}) { | ||
json // string[] | ||
} | ||
|
||
export function prepareConfigWithoutAnnotation({ | ||
additionalFiles: { | ||
json = [] | ||
~~~~ | ||
!!! error TS7031: Binding element 'json' implicitly has an 'any[]' type. | ||
} = {} | ||
} = {}) { | ||
json | ||
} | ||
|
||
/** @type {(param: { | ||
additionalFiles?: Partial<Record<"json" | "jsonc" | "json5", string[]>>; | ||
}) => void} */ | ||
export const prepareConfigWithContextualSignature = ({ | ||
additionalFiles: { | ||
json = [] | ||
} = {} | ||
} = {})=> { | ||
json // string[] | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Additional repros from https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/issues/59936 | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* @param {{ a?: { json?: string[] }}} [config] | ||
*/ | ||
function f1({ a: { json = [] } = {} } = {}) { return json } | ||
|
||
/** | ||
* @param {[[string[]?]?]} [x] | ||
*/ | ||
function f2([[json = []] = []] = []) { return json } | ||
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
53 changes: 0 additions & 53 deletions
53
...oduleAccepted/conformance/destructuringParameterDeclaration9(strict=true).errors.txt.diff
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this new function is called from a couple of other places in Strada. Why not in Corsa too?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I only see 3
getWidenedLiteralTypeForInitializer
hits in both codebases 🤔 And they seem to be in the same places. Same forwidenTypeInferredFromInitializer
(4 hits)Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How is that possible? This PR is introducing getWidenedLiteralTypeForInitializer and only adds one call
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it splits the old
widenTypeInferredFromInitializer
intowidenTypeInferredFromInitializer
andgetWidenedLiteralTypeForInitializer
. You have the second call togetWidenedLiteralTypeForInitializer
at the top of the new version ofwidenTypeInferredFromInitializer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Right, but the old code had other calls to the get variant
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, I'm wrong, it seems fine