Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve multiple modifications across several files, primarily focusing on renaming types and functions to adhere to Go's naming conventions, as well as altering the logger initialization method. The control flow in the Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
internal/logger/logger.go (2)
19-19: Update package documentation to reflect the new function name.Since the main initialization function has been renamed, it's important to update the package documentation to reflect this change. This will help maintain clear and accurate documentation for users of the package.
Consider adding or updating the package documentation at the top of the file:
// Package logger provides a simple logging interface. // Use New() to initialize the logger before use. package logger
Line range hint
1-1: Fix typo in PR titleThe PR title contains a typo: "Improvments" should be "Improvements".
Please update the PR title to "Iter2: Improvements" for clarity and correctness in commit history and changelogs.
internal/app/api.go (3)
25-25: LGTM! Consider adding error handling.The change from
logger.Inittologger.Newlooks good and likely reflects an update in the logger package's API. This change adopts a more idiomatic Go approach for initialization.Consider adding error handling for the
logger.Newcall, as initialization functions often return an error that should be checked:-logger.New(nil, cfg.Logger.Level) +if err := logger.New(nil, cfg.Logger.Level); err != nil { + return fmt.Errorf("failed to initialize logger: %w", err) +}
Line range hint
58-66: Potential issue: Background process started before error checkThe current implementation starts the background process (
UpdateOrdersInBackground) before checking if the service initialization was successful. This could lead to unexpected behavior if the service initialization fails.Consider moving the background process initiation after the error check:
ss, err := service.NewServices(userService, tms, accrualClient) -// starting the backgorun process -ss.UpdateOrdersInBackground(ctx, 1*time.Second) if err != nil { logger.Log.ErrorContext(ctx, "failed to init services", slog.String("err", err.Error())) return err } +// starting the background process +ss.UpdateOrdersInBackground(ctx, 1*time.Second)This ensures that the background process is only started if the service initialization is successful.
Line range hint
22-110: Consider refactoring for improved code structureThe
Runfunction is quite long and handles multiple responsibilities. Consider refactoring it to improve readability and maintainability:
- Extract initialization logic into separate functions (e.g.,
initLogger,initRepository,initServices).- Standardize error handling to reduce repetition.
- Consider using a struct to hold all the components (logger, repository, services, server) and methods to initialize them.
Here's a high-level example of how you might refactor:
type App struct { cfg *config.Config logger *slog.Logger repo *repository.Repository services *service.Services server *server.Server } func NewApp() (*App, error) { app := &App{ cfg: config.NewConfig(), } if err := app.initLogger(); err != nil { return nil, err } if err := app.initRepository(); err != nil { return nil, err } if err := app.initServices(); err != nil { return nil, err } if err := app.initServer(); err != nil { return nil, err } return app, nil } func (a *App) Run() error { // Server running logic // Graceful shutdown logic } // Add methods like initLogger, initRepository, etc.This structure separates concerns and makes the code more modular and easier to test.
internal/delivery/user.go (2)
45-45: LGTM with a minor suggestionThe change to use
UserHandleras the receiver is consistent with the struct renaming. The method's logic remains unchanged, which is good.As a minor improvement, consider using a constant for the "Content-Type" header name to improve maintainability. You're already using a constant for the content type value (
PlainTextContentType), so it would be consistent to do the same for the header name.Consider applying this change:
- if r.Header.Get(ContentTypeHeaderName) != PlainTextContentType { + if r.Header.Get("Content-Type") != PlainTextContentType {This assumes you'll remove the
ContentTypeHeaderNameconstant if it's not used elsewhere in the codebase.
94-94: LGTM with suggestion to remove debug statementsThe change to use
UserHandleras the receiver is consistent with the struct renaming. The method's logic remains unchanged, which is good.However, there are some debug print statements in the method that might not be necessary in production code:
fmt.Printf("%#v", orders) fmt.Println("order cOunt", len(orders))Consider removing these debug print statements before merging this PR, unless they serve a specific purpose in your development or logging strategy.
internal/repository/postgres/user.go (1)
17-19: LGTM! Consider documenting the exported struct.The renaming of
userRepositorytoUserRepositorymakes the struct public, which is consistent with Go naming conventions for exported types. This change may impact the package's API, potentially allowing external packages to directly instantiateUserRepository.Consider adding a comment to document the
UserRepositorystruct, explaining its purpose and any important details about its usage, as it's now part of the public API.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- internal/app/api.go (1 hunks)
- internal/delivery/auth.go (2 hunks)
- internal/delivery/user.go (6 hunks)
- internal/logger/logger.go (1 hunks)
- internal/repository/postgres/user.go (11 hunks)
- internal/service/order.go (0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- internal/service/order.go
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 golangci-lint
internal/delivery/user.go
[error] 27-27: undefined: chi
(typecheck)
🔇 Additional comments (22)
internal/logger/logger.go (1)
19-19: Approve renamingInittoNew, but verify impact on external code.The renaming from
InittoNewaligns better with Go conventions for constructor-like functions. This is a good improvement in terms of idiomatic Go code.However, this is a breaking change for any external code that was calling
logger.Init(). Please run the following script to check for any usage of the oldInitfunction in the codebase:✅ Verification successful
Renaming
InittoNewverified and approved.The renaming aligns with Go conventions, and no usages of
logger.Initwere found in the codebase, ensuring that the change is safe.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for usage of the old `Init` function in the codebase # Test: Search for logger.Init usage echo "Searching for logger.Init usage:" rg --type go 'logger\.Init\(' # If no results are found, it's likely that the change is safe if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "No usage of logger.Init found. The renaming appears to be safe." else echo "Usage of logger.Init found. Please update these calls to use logger.New instead." fiLength of output: 261
internal/delivery/auth.go (3)
30-30: Approve method receiver updates.The method receivers for
SigninandSignuphave been correctly updated to use*AuthHandler, which is consistent with the struct renaming. The functionality of these methods remains unchanged, which is appropriate.Also applies to: 89-89
26-27:⚠️ Potential issueFix typo in function name and approve return type change.
The return type has been correctly updated to
*AuthHandler, which is consistent with the struct renaming. However, there's a typo in the function name that needs to be addressed.Please apply the following change:
-func NewAuthHanler(auth Auth) *AuthHandler { +func NewAuthHandler(auth Auth) *AuthHandler { return &AuthHandler{auth} }After fixing the typo, run this script to ensure the function is correctly referenced throughout the codebase:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for correct usage of 'NewAuthHandler' # Test: Search for 'NewAuthHandler' in all Go files. Expect: Only correct usages. rg --type go 'NewAuthHandler'
Line range hint
1-150: Overall improvements and suggestions for further enhancements.The changes in this file improve the code structure by following Go naming conventions for exported types. However, there are a few additional points to consider:
The PR title contains a typo ("Improvments"). Consider updating it to "Iter2: Improvements" for better clarity.
While the naming has been improved, there might be other areas for enhancement:
- Consider adding comments to explain the purpose of the
AuthHandlerstruct and its methods.- The error handling could potentially be refactored to reduce repetition.
- The
SigninandSignupmethods are quite long. Consider breaking them down into smaller, more focused functions.Ensure that all references to the renamed types have been updated throughout the codebase.
Would you like assistance in implementing any of these suggestions?
To ensure comprehensive test coverage for the authentication functionality, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check test coverage for auth-related code # Test: Search for auth-related test files. Expect: Comprehensive test coverage. fd -e go test authinternal/delivery/user.go (5)
129-129: LGTMThe change to use
UserHandleras the receiver is consistent with the struct renaming. The method's logic remains unchanged and appears to be implemented correctly.
Line range hint
1-191: Summary of changes and recommendationsOverall, the changes in this file look good. The main change was renaming
userHandlertoUserHandler, making it an exported type. This change is consistently applied throughout the file.Here's a summary of the main points to address:
- Verify the intention behind exporting
UserHandlerand consider any potential impact on the package's API.- Check the
chipackage import and ensure it's correctly set up in the project dependencies.- Consider using a constant for the "Content-Type" header name in the
registerOrdermethod.- Remove debug print statements in the
getOrdersmethod if they're not needed in production.- Fix the typo in the
withrawalPointsmethod name (should bewithdrawalPoints).After addressing these points, the code will be in good shape for merging.
🧰 Tools
🪛 golangci-lint
[error] 27-27: undefined: chi
(typecheck)
[error] 30-30: undefined: chi
(typecheck)
144-144:⚠️ Potential issueLGTM with a typo correction
The change to use
UserHandleras the receiver is consistent with the struct renaming. The method's logic remains unchanged and appears to be implemented correctly.However, there's a typo in the method name: "withrawal" instead of "withdrawal".
Please correct the typo in the method name. Here's the suggested change:
-func (uh *UserHandler) withrawalPoints(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { +func (uh *UserHandler) withdrawalPoints(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) {Don't forget to update any calls to this method elsewhere in the codebase.
To help identify any places where this method is called, you can run:
#!/bin/bash # Search for calls to 'withrawalPoints' rg --type go 'withrawalPoints'This will help ensure that all occurrences of the misspelled method name are updated.
28-28: Verifychiimport and usageThe change to use
UserHandleris consistent with the struct renaming. However, there's a static analysis hint about an undefinedchiat line 27. This could indicate a missing or incorrect import.Please check the following:
- Ensure that the
chipackage is properly imported at the top of the file.- Verify that the
chipackage is installed and available in your project's dependencies.To help verify the
chiimport and usage, you can run the following command:#!/bin/bash # Check for chi import and usage rg --type go 'import.*"github.com/go-chi/chi/v5"' rg --type go 'chi\.NewMux\(\)'This will help identify if the
chipackage is properly imported and used in the codebase.
23-23: Verify the intention behind exportingUserHandlerThe struct has been changed from
userHandlertoUserHandler, making it exported. While this allows external packages to use this struct directly, it also changes the public API of the package.Please confirm if this change is intentional and consider the following:
- Does this change align with the package's design and intended usage?
- Are there any external packages or code that might break due to this change?
- Do you need to update any documentation or tests to reflect this change?
To help verify the impact of this change, you can run the following command to find any usages of
userHandlerin the codebase:This will help identify any places where the old unexported version was used and might need updating.
✅ Verification successful
Exporting
UserHandlerVerified SuccessfullyThe renaming of
userHandlertoUserHandlerhas been consistently applied across the codebase, ensuring that the public API remains intact and no existing references are broken.
- No remaining usages of
userHandlerwere found in the codebase.- All references have been updated to use the exported
UserHandler.Note: A potential typo was identified in
withrawalPoints. Please review and correct it towithdrawalPointsif necessary.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of 'userHandler' in the codebase rg --type go 'userHandler'Length of output: 307
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected: Search for usages of 'userHandler' in the codebase rg --type go 'userHandler'Length of output: 26
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of 'UserHandler' in the codebase rg --type go 'UserHandler' # Search for potential typos of 'withdrawalPoints' rg --type go 'withrawalPoints'Length of output: 1009
internal/repository/postgres/user.go (13)
21-25: LGTM! Function signature updated correctly.The
NewUserRepositoryfunction signature has been correctly updated to return*UserRepository, which is consistent with the struct renaming. The function's logic remains unchanged, maintaining its current behavior.
28-28: LGTM! Method receiver updated correctly.The
Createmethod's receiver has been correctly updated to*UserRepository, which is consistent with the struct renaming. The method's logic and signature (apart from the receiver) remain unchanged.
63-63: LGTM! Method receiver updated correctly.The
SetSessionTokenmethod's receiver has been correctly updated to*UserRepository, which is consistent with the struct renaming. The method's logic and signature (apart from the receiver) remain unchanged.
77-77: LGTM! Method receiver updated correctly.The
GetUserByLoginmethod's receiver has been correctly updated to*UserRepository, which is consistent with the struct renaming. The method's logic and signature (apart from the receiver) remain unchanged.
104-104: LGTM! Method receiver updated correctly.The
GetUserByIDmethod's receiver has been correctly updated to*UserRepository, which is consistent with the struct renaming. The method's logic and signature (apart from the receiver) remain unchanged.
127-127: LGTM! Method receiver updated correctly.The
RegisterOrdermethod's receiver has been correctly updated to*UserRepository, which is consistent with the struct renaming. The method's logic and signature (apart from the receiver) remain unchanged.
184-184: LGTM! Method receiver updated correctly.The
GetUserOrdersmethod's receiver has been correctly updated to*UserRepository, which is consistent with the struct renaming. The method's logic and signature (apart from the receiver) remain unchanged.
220-222: LGTM! Method receiver updated correctly.The
GetUserBalancemethod's receiver has been correctly updated to*UserRepository, which is consistent with the struct renaming. The method's logic and signature (apart from the receiver) remain unchanged.
224-224: LGTM! Method receiver updated correctly.The
WithdrawalPointsmethod's receiver has been correctly updated to*UserRepository, which is consistent with the struct renaming. The method's logic and signature (apart from the receiver) remain unchanged.
275-275: LGTM! Method receiver updated correctly.The
getUserBalancemethod's receiver has been correctly updated to*UserRepository, which is consistent with the struct renaming. The method's logic, signature (apart from the receiver), and visibility (unexported) remain unchanged.
289-289: LGTM! Method receiver updated correctly.The
GetWithdrawalsmethod's receiver has been correctly updated to*UserRepository, which is consistent with the struct renaming. The method's logic and signature (apart from the receiver) remain unchanged.
326-326: LGTM! Method receivers updated correctly for both methods.The
GetUnfinishedOrdersandUpdateOrdermethods' receivers have been correctly updated to*UserRepository, which is consistent with the struct renaming. The methods' logic and signatures (apart from the receivers) remain unchanged.Also applies to: 373-373
Line range hint
1-424: Overall changes look good, but consider adding documentation.The changes in this file consistently rename
userRepositorytoUserRepository, making the struct and its methods public. This change aligns with Go naming conventions for exported types. However, it's important to note that this change could impact the package's API by allowing external packages to directly instantiate and useUserRepository.Consider adding documentation comments for the
UserRepositorystruct and its public methods to provide clear usage guidelines for users of this package.To ensure all occurrences of
userRepositoryhave been updated, run the following command:If this command returns any results, it indicates that some occurrences of
userRepositorymay have been missed in the renaming process.✅ Verification successful
Renaming Verified Successfully.
All instances of
userRepositoryhave been successfully renamed toUserRepository. No remaining references were found.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining instances of "userRepository" rg --type go 'userRepository' .Length of output: 31
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Comprehensive search for any remaining instances of "userRepository" in Go files, including comments and strings rg --type go --ignore-case --multiline 'userRepository' .Length of output: 2021
| type AuthHandler struct { | ||
| Auth |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Incomplete renaming of authHandler detected.
The struct authHandler has been renamed to AuthHandler, but the following references still use authHandler:
internal/delivery/handler.goauthHandler := NewAuthHanler(h.Auth)r.Post("/login", authHandler.Signin)r.Post("/register", authHandler.Signup)
Please update these instances to AuthHandler to ensure consistency and prevent potential issues.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approve the struct renaming and verify its impact.
The renaming of authHandler to AuthHandler follows Go's naming convention for exported types. This is a good improvement for consistency and potential reusability.
To ensure this change doesn't break any existing code, please run the following script to check for any remaining references to the old name:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to 'authHandler'
# Test: Search for 'authHandler' in all Go files. Expect: No results.
rg --type go 'authHandler'
Length of output: 206
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining references to 'authHandler' in Go files
# Test: Search for 'authHandler' in all Go files. Expect: No results.
rg --type go 'authHandler'
Length of output: 232
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
internal/service/service.go (1)
Line range hint
67-124: Consider implementing rate limiting for AccrualClient callsWhile updating the orders, it's important to ensure that we're not overwhelming the AccrualClient with too many requests in a short period.
Consider implementing a rate limiter for AccrualClient calls. This could be done using a token bucket algorithm or a simple time-based limiter. Here's a simple example using time.Sleep:
import "golang.org/x/time/rate" var limiter = rate.NewLimiter(rate.Every(time.Second), 10) // 10 requests per second func (ss *Services) updateOrders(ctx context.Context) { // ... existing code ... for _, order := range orders { if err := limiter.Wait(ctx); err != nil { logger.Log.Error("rate limit exceeded", slog.String("err", err.Error())) return } updateOrder, err := ss.AccrualClient.GetOrderInfo(ctx, order) // ... rest of the code ... } }This ensures that we're not sending more than 10 requests per second to the AccrualClient. Adjust the rate as needed based on the AccrualClient's requirements.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- internal/app/api.go (3 hunks)
- internal/service/service.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- internal/app/api.go
🔇 Additional comments (1)
internal/service/service.go (1)
Line range hint
67-124: Removal of unnecessary console output is approvedThe removal of the loop that printed order numbers and statuses is a good change. It reduces unnecessary console output, which is particularly beneficial in production environments.
The code is now cleaner and more suitable for production use. Good job on removing debug prints!
| // TODO: Batch update | ||
| // TODO: Batch update background |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider implementing batch updates for improved efficiency
The TODO comments suggest plans for batch updates. This is a good direction for optimization, especially if dealing with a large number of orders.
Consider implementing a batch update mechanism. This could involve:
- Grouping orders by status.
- Sending batch requests to the AccrualClient.
- Processing responses in bulk.
Here's a conceptual example of how you might start this refactoring:
func (ss *Services) updateOrders(ctx context.Context) {
orders, err := ss.UserService.GetUnfinishedOrders(ctx)
if err != nil {
logger.Log.Error("update orders: get unfinished orders", slog.String("err", err.Error()))
return
}
if len(orders) == 0 {
return
}
// Group orders by status
ordersByStatus := make(map[string][]domain.Order)
for _, order := range orders {
ordersByStatus[order.OrderStatus] = append(ordersByStatus[order.OrderStatus], order)
}
// Process each status group
for status, ordersGroup := range ordersByStatus {
// TODO: Implement batch request to AccrualClient
// updatedOrders, err := ss.AccrualClient.GetOrdersInfoBatch(ctx, ordersGroup)
// TODO: Process batch response and update orders
// for _, updatedOrder := range updatedOrders {
// err := ss.UserService.UpdateOrder(ctx, updatedOrder)
// if err != nil {
// logger.Log.Error("failed to update the order status", slog.String("err", err.Error()))
// }
// }
}
}This approach would require modifications to the AccrualClient interface to support batch operations.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
orderServiceimplementation, streamlining order management.Chores