- 
        Couldn't load subscription status. 
- Fork 80
feat: enforce global singleton for all exposed modules via module federation #308
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Closed
      
      
    
  
     Closed
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
  File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should not add more globals, this entire thing already exists in FEDERATION
should be using loadShare('lib', {from: 'name of current app'}); or at least from share_scope_map off federation
This will also not work with module layers which is being introduced, where you can have concurrent parallel share scopes who still respect singletons, but within the scope - so in cases like next, i have 13 singletons for react.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
According to the tests I have made, the instance is not unique, so the instance may be recreated. I'd like to know what your approach is to avoid the problem of multiple instances
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There should be 1 instance per app. Recreation of instances shouldn't happen.
If thats is happening theres a bigger problem
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
instance is stored in memory / state and registered in the federation global, we search for the instance by name.
These arch specs may be useful. https://github.com/module-federation/core/pull/3955/files#diff-5596198c9d0ae99e768d378410829b221f2ac61b098aa86e5c55a994d6efb964
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This may be the case for Webpack, but not for Vite. Based on my tests, I created an Axios instance with Keycloak for the token part and shared this instance with the other remotes. However, doing so resulted in the instances being created twice.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yeah then its a bug in vite implementation. all webpack does is implement the runtime package.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gioboa what do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can totally trust @ScriptedAlchemy
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gioboa do you think you can do an investigation to know why we don't have this in the Vite version
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Id check why instances are recreated. In webpack. We do have 1 aspect where we assign the instance associated with that runtime to webpack_require. So we can access the instance throughout the application.
However I can also call init() multiple times over and it doesn't recreate the instance because we store it in a scoped variable - but thats what /runtime init does.
We did introduce createInstance now as well to runtime.