Skip to content

Update forward-error-correction.mdx #50

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
kixelated merged 1 commit into from
Jun 29, 2025
Merged

Update forward-error-correction.mdx #50

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions src/pages/blog/forward-error-correction.mdx
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ It's wasteful but it's simple and might be good enough for some hops.
## In Defense of FEC

This is a hot topic and I am quite ignorant.
I don't to be too dismissive.
I don't want to be too dismissive.

There are absolutely scenarios where FEC is the best solution.
When you're sending data over a satellite link, you're dealing with a high RTT and burst loss.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -194,4 +194,4 @@ Just please, never show me a graph based on random packet loss again.

Written by [@kixelated](https://github.com/kixelated).

![@kixelated](/blog/avatar.png)
![@kixelated](/blog/avatar.png)