While packet creating Threshold values and score values are giving same, continue button is not enable in biometric page #628
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…t button should not enabled Signed-off-by: Rakshithasai123 <rakshithasai2002@gmail.com> # Conflicts: # lib/ui/settings/widgets/global_config_settings_tab.dart
…me, continue button is not enable in biometric page Signed-off-by: Rakshithasai123 <rakshithasai2002@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rakshithasai123 <rakshithasai2002@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rakshithasai123 <rakshithasai2002@gmail.com>
WalkthroughTwo files modified: biometric validation logic in Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Signed-off-by: Rakshithasai123 <rakshithasai2002@gmail.com>
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Repository UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
lib/ui/process_ui/generic_process.dart(2 hunks)lib/ui/settings/widgets/global_config_settings_tab.dart(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
lib/ui/settings/widgets/global_config_settings_tab.dart (1)
31-31: Formatting changes only—no functional impact.These whitespace additions don't affect behavior or maintainability.
Also applies to: 177-177, 180-180
Comment on lines
+526
to
534
| List<BiometricAttributeData> list = globalProvider.fieldInputValue[field.id!] ?? []; | ||
| if (list.isNotEmpty) { | ||
| BiometricAttributeData lastCapture = list.last; | ||
| if (lastCapture.qualityPercentage < int.parse(lastCapture.thresholdPercentage)) { | ||
| isValid = false; | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling for threshold parsing.
int.parse() will throw a FormatException if thresholdPercentage is not a valid integer string or if it's null. This can crash the validation flow.
🔎 Apply this diff to add safe parsing with error handling:
if (globalProvider.isValidBiometricCapture) {
List<BiometricAttributeData> list = globalProvider.fieldInputValue[field.id!] ?? [];
if (list.isNotEmpty) {
BiometricAttributeData lastCapture = list.last;
- if (lastCapture.qualityPercentage < int.parse(lastCapture.thresholdPercentage)) {
+ int? threshold = int.tryParse(lastCapture.thresholdPercentage);
+ if (threshold != null && lastCapture.qualityPercentage < threshold) {
isValid = false;
break;
}
}
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| List<BiometricAttributeData> list = globalProvider.fieldInputValue[field.id!] ?? []; | |
| if (list.isNotEmpty) { | |
| BiometricAttributeData lastCapture = list.last; | |
| if (lastCapture.qualityPercentage < int.parse(lastCapture.thresholdPercentage)) { | |
| isValid = false; | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } | |
| List<BiometricAttributeData> list = globalProvider.fieldInputValue[field.id!] ?? []; | |
| if (list.isNotEmpty) { | |
| BiometricAttributeData lastCapture = list.last; | |
| int? threshold = int.tryParse(lastCapture.thresholdPercentage); | |
| if (threshold != null && lastCapture.qualityPercentage < threshold) { | |
| isValid = false; | |
| break; | |
| } | |
| } | |
| } |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lib/ui/process_ui/generic_process.dart around lines 526 to 534, the code uses
int.parse(lastCapture.thresholdPercentage) which can throw FormatException or
NPE if thresholdPercentage is null; change this to use safe parsing (int? parsed
= int.tryParse(lastCapture.thresholdPercentage ?? '');) and handle the
null/failed-parse case by treating the capture as invalid (set isValid = false;
break) and optionally log or record the malformed threshold for diagnostics;
ensure no exceptions propagate from parsing so the validation flow continues
safely.
Comment on lines
+575
to
+584
| List<BiometricAttributeData> list = globalProvider.fieldInputValue[field.id!] ?? []; | ||
| if (list.isNotEmpty) { | ||
| BiometricAttributeData lastCapture = list.last; | ||
| if (lastCapture.qualityPercentage < int.parse(lastCapture.thresholdPercentage)) { | ||
| isValid = false; | ||
| break; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion | 🟠 Major
Extract duplicated validation logic into a helper method.
This quality validation block is identical to the one at lines 526-534. Duplicate logic increases maintenance burden and bug risk.
🔎 View suggested refactor to eliminate duplication:
Add this helper method to the class:
bool _isLastCaptureQualityValid(String fieldId) {
List<BiometricAttributeData> list = globalProvider.fieldInputValue[fieldId] ?? [];
if (list.isEmpty) return true;
BiometricAttributeData lastCapture = list.last;
int? threshold = int.tryParse(lastCapture.thresholdPercentage);
if (threshold == null) return true; // or false, depending on policy
return lastCapture.qualityPercentage >= threshold;
}Then replace both occurrences with:
if (globalProvider.isValidBiometricCapture) {
- List<BiometricAttributeData> list = globalProvider.fieldInputValue[field.id!] ?? [];
- if (list.isNotEmpty) {
- BiometricAttributeData lastCapture = list.last;
- if (lastCapture.qualityPercentage < int.parse(lastCapture.thresholdPercentage)) {
- isValid = false;
- break;
- }
- }
+ if (!_isLastCaptureQualityValid(field.id!)) {
+ isValid = false;
+ break;
+ }
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In lib/ui/process_ui/generic_process.dart around lines 526-534 and 575-584 there
is duplicated last-capture quality validation; extract that logic into a private
helper on the class (e.g. _isLastCaptureQualityValid) that takes the fieldId,
fetches the list from globalProvider.fieldInputValue[fieldId] using a default
empty list, returns true if empty, safely parses threshold with int.tryParse and
returns true on parse failure (or adjust to project policy), and compares
lastCapture.qualityPercentage >= threshold; then replace both duplicated blocks
with a single call to this helper.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
RCF-1268
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.