Skip to content
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
<!-- badges: start -->
[![](https://img.shields.io/badge/lifecycle-stable-yellow.svg)](https://lifecycle.r-lib.org/articles/stages.html#stable)
[![](https://img.shields.io/github/last-commit/mrbakhsh/MSiP.svg)](https://github.com/mrbakhsh/MSiP/commits/main)
[![CRAN Version](https://www.r-pkg.org/badges/version/MSiP)](https://cran.r-project.org/package=MSiP)
[![Downloads from the RStudio CRAN mirror](https://cranlogs.r-pkg.org/badges/MSiP)](https://cranlogs.r-pkg.org/badges/MSiP)
[![License: GPL (&gt;=
3)](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-GPL%20(%3E=%203)-orange.svg)](https://cran.r-project.org/web/licenses/GPL%20(%3E=%203))
<!-- badges: end -->


# Mass Spectrometry interaction Prediction (MSiP)
The MSiP is a computational approach to predict protein-protein interactions from largescale affinity purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS) data. This approach includes both spoke and matrix models for interpreting AP-MS data in a network context. The 'spoke' model considers only bait-prey interactions, whereas the 'matrix' model assumes that each of the identified proteins (baits and prey) in a given AP-MS experiment interacts with each of the others. The spoke model has a high false-negative rate, whereas the matrix model has a high false-positive rate. Although, both statistical models have merits, a combination of both models has shown to increase the performance of machine learning classifiers in terms of their capabilities in discrimination between true and false positive interactions [Drew et al., 2017](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5488662).

Expand Down