Skip to content

Conversation

srepmub
Copy link

@srepmub srepmub commented May 20, 2025

by passing missing include_fields parameter.

fixes issue #101 for me.

@m-antonov
Copy link
Collaborator

@srepmub thank you for your PR. Please fix the formatting and order of the 'included' in the tests. After that, the changes can be merged into the main branch.

@srepmub srepmub force-pushed the include_custom_fields_other_direction branch from 863bcef to 8979ba8 Compare May 22, 2025 13:56
@srepmub
Copy link
Author

srepmub commented May 22, 2025

not entirely sure what you mean, but how about this..? (user1 and user2 are already in the right order though it seems?)

@srepmub srepmub force-pushed the include_custom_fields_other_direction branch 2 times, most recently from 837d582 to 39855bd Compare May 23, 2025 13:19
@srepmub
Copy link
Author

srepmub commented May 23, 2025

fix a formatting issue.

@srepmub srepmub force-pushed the include_custom_fields_other_direction branch from 39855bd to ad7bc3a Compare May 26, 2025 08:41
@srepmub
Copy link
Author

srepmub commented May 26, 2025

not sure why 'black' insists on putting certain things on a single line, but not similar code elsewhere. another attempt :P

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.44%. Comparing base (a1a4fc5) to head (ad7bc3a).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #104   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   91.44%   91.44%           
=======================================
  Files          44       44           
  Lines        2408     2408           
  Branches      279      279           
=======================================
  Hits         2202     2202           
  Misses        143      143           
  Partials       63       63           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 91.44% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
fastapi_jsonapi/views/view_base.py 93.05% <100.00%> (ø)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@srepmub
Copy link
Author

srepmub commented Jun 26, 2025

okay now 'ruff' fails.. will try to fix

by passing missing include_fields parameter.
@srepmub srepmub force-pushed the include_custom_fields_other_direction branch from ad7bc3a to 16e7cf3 Compare June 26, 2025 09:04
@srepmub
Copy link
Author

srepmub commented Jun 26, 2025

sorry for the delay. hope everything passes now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants