Suggested Changes To Support Access To Test Results By Downstream Consumers#72
Open
GaryBurgin wants to merge 1 commit intomuselab-d2x:mainfrom
Open
Suggested Changes To Support Access To Test Results By Downstream Consumers#72GaryBurgin wants to merge 1 commit intomuselab-d2x:mainfrom
GaryBurgin wants to merge 1 commit intomuselab-d2x:mainfrom
Conversation
…ctions - The ci_feature_2gp flow runs run_tests, which produces test_results.json and test_results.xml by default - These files are currently lost when the job completes — no downstream consumers can access them - Uploading them as artifacts enables consuming workflows (via workflow_run trigger) to download and report on results (e.g., PR comments, badge generation) - retention-days: 7 keeps storage costs minimal - if-no-files-found: warn avoids failing the job if tests were skipped
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Another alternative would be to create a custom fork of this flow and modify it, is this what you would recommend or is the above a reasonable approach?