No changes needed - it is valid implicit block parameter in Ruby 3.4
#264
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Update to address feedback on migrating to JRuby 6.0 specs
No changes needed - Nov 16, 2025
it is valid implicit block parameter in Ruby 3.4
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Addressed review comment on PR #263 regarding use of
itas implicit block parameter.Analysis
The code in question:
The automated reviewer flagged
itas undefined, but this is a Ruby 3.4 language feature. Theitimplicit block parameter is valid and intentional in this context, as confirmed by the original commit author.Conclusion
No changes required. The code is correct for Ruby 3.4+.
💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.