- 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 25
 
Add 4 new Netwrix Access Analyzer KBs for ExchangePS and SPAA/SPAC errors #306
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…S and SPAA/SPAC errors and warnings
…S and SPAA/SPAC errors and warnings
          Pull Request Review - PR #306Thank you for submitting these Knowledge Base articles for Netwrix Access Analyzer. I've completed a thorough review and have identified several critical issues that need to be addressed before this PR can be merged. Critical Issues1. Empty Files - BLOCKERThree of the four KB articles mentioned in the PR description are completely empty: 
 Action Required: These files must be populated with content before the PR can be merged. The PR description indicates these articles should contain: 
 2. Missing File Extensions - BLOCKERThe files listed above are missing the  Current: 
 Expected: 
 Issues with 
 | 
    
          PR Review: Add 4 new Netwrix Access Analyzer KB ArticlesSummaryThis PR initially attempted to add 4 new Knowledge Base articles for Netwrix Access Analyzer, but the final state shows all files were deleted. The PR has gone through 3 commits with various issues. Critical Issues 🚨1. All Files Deleted - No Content in PRThe final commit (5cd71cb) deleted all the KB article files, leaving the PR with zero additions. This means: 
 Files that were deleted: 
 2. Empty Files CreatedIn the first two commits, 3 out of 4 files were created as empty files with no content: 
 3. Missing File ExtensionsThree KB article files are missing the  
 All existing KB articles in  Issues Found in the Content (Before Deletion)4. Inconsistent Front Matter FormatThe  keywords: [SPAA, SPAC, SPSEEK, InvalidStorageVersionException, Netwrix, Access Analyzer, system scan, storage version, error 11603]However, existing KB articles use list syntax: keywords:
  - SPAA
  - SPAC
  - Invalid local storage versionRecommendation: Use the list syntax for consistency with existing KB articles. 5. Placeholder Knowledge Article IDsBoth articles use placeholder IDs: knowledge_article_id: kA0Qk000000XXXXKAAThese need to be replaced with actual Salesforce Knowledge Article IDs before merging. 6. Title/Heading DuplicationIn  
 This is inconsistent with other KB articles like  7. Inconsistent "Related Queries" Section
 Recommendation: Standardize the format across all KB articles. 8. Content Quality IssuesIn Error-invalid-local-SPAA-storage-version: 
 In failed-to-initialize-task.md: 
 Best Practices & Recommendations9. Missing Required SectionsComparing with existing KB articles, these sections should be considered: 
 10. Naming ConventionFile names should follow kebab-case consistently. Currently we have: 
 Security & Performance✅ No security concerns identified Test Coverage
 Action ItemsBefore this PR can be merged, the following must be addressed: 
 Commit History IssuesThe commit history shows: 
 The third commit message says it's adding content, but it actually deleted everything. This suggests the commits may have been made in error or the wrong files were staged. Overall Assessment❌ This PR cannot be merged in its current state. All content has been deleted, and the PR needs to be rebuilt with proper file extensions, complete content, and consistent formatting. The quality of the content that was initially added (particularly   | 
    
          Pull Request Review: Add 4 new Netwrix Access Analyzer KBsSummaryThis PR adds 4 well-structured Knowledge Base articles for Netwrix Access Analyzer covering ExchangePS and SPAA/SPAC errors. Overall, the content is high quality, technically sound, and follows established KB conventions. Below are my findings across multiple review categories. ✅ StrengthsContent Quality
 Metadata
 🔍 Issues Found1. Inconsistent Heading Structure (Minor)Issue: The new articles use  Observation: Examining existing KB articles shows variation: 
 Recommendation: This is acceptable, but consider establishing a standard heading hierarchy in your style guide for future consistency. 2. Front Matter Format Inconsistency (Minor)Issue: The new articles use inline YAML format for  keywords: [SPAA, SPAC, SPSEEK, InvalidStorageVersionException, ...]Existing pattern: Other KB articles use block-style YAML: keywords:
  - connection profile
  - credentials
  - domain matchingRecommendation: Use the block-style format to match existing articles: File:  keywords:
  - SPAA
  - SPAC
  - SPSEEK
  - InvalidStorageVersionException
  - Netwrix
  - Access Analyzer
  - system scan
  - storage version
  - error 11603Apply similar changes to the other 3 files. 3. Sidebar Label Truncation (Minor)File:  Issue: sidebar_label: "ExchangePS Error: The WinRM Shell Client Cannot Process the Request"This is 73 characters long, which may be too long for sidebar display in some documentation frameworks. Recommendation: Consider shortening to: sidebar_label: "ExchangePS: WinRM Shell Client Error"4. Minor Formatting Inconsistency (Cosmetic)File:  Lines 48-53: Inconsistent bullet point style: - Update `PackageManagement` module:
  ```powershell
  Install-Module PackageManagement -Force -Scope AllUsers
  | 
    
| 
           Closing this PR — starting a new one to update the correct KB files. Updates from Error-invalid-local-SPAA-storage-version.md will be merged with https://docs.netwrix.com/docs/kb/accessanalyzer/error-invalid-local-storage-version.  | 
    
Added the following new Knowledge Base articles for Netwrix Access Analyzer:
SEEK Bulk Import Warning: DLPEX Database Does Not Exist
ExchangePS Error: The WinRM Shell Client Cannot Process the Request
ExchangePS Error: Cannot Find a Variable With the Name "EnableSearchOnlySession"
Error: Invalid Local SPAA Storage Version. Expected 11603 but Found 0
All articles include front matter metadata and comply with Netwrix KB Markdown standards (Symptom/Cause/Resolution format, light UI formatting, and related queries).