Skip to content

Fix database compatibility issues in Enhanced Contact Intelligence implementation#18

Draft
Copilot wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
copilot/fix-17
Draft

Fix database compatibility issues in Enhanced Contact Intelligence implementation#18
Copilot wants to merge 5 commits intomainfrom
copilot/fix-17

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Aug 12, 2025

The Enhanced Contact Intelligence implementation had critical database compatibility issues that prevented proper testing and development workflows. The original implementation used PostgreSQL-specific data types (JSONB and ARRAY) that are incompatible with SQLite, causing all tests to fail.

Issues Fixed

Database Compatibility Crisis:

  • All 19/23 tests were failing with SQLiteTypeCompiler can't render element of type JSONB
  • PostgreSQL-specific JSONB and ARRAY types broke SQLite compatibility
  • Development environment was unusable due to database incompatibility
  • Testing infrastructure completely broken

Root Cause:
The Contact model and related models used PostgreSQL-specific column types:

# Before - PostgreSQL only
important_dates = Column(JSONB)
hobbies = Column(ARRAY(Text))
industry_experience = Column(ARRAY(Text))

Solution:
Replaced all PostgreSQL-specific types with cross-database compatible JSON:

# After - Cross-database compatible
important_dates = Column(JSON)
hobbies = Column(JSON)
industry_experience = Column(JSON)

Changes Made

Models Updated:

  • Contact: 9 fields converted from JSONB/ARRAY to JSON
  • ContactInteraction: 2 fields converted to JSON arrays
  • ContactAIInsight: 1 field converted to JSON
  • ContactRelationshipScore: 1 field converted to JSON

Database Migration Fixed:

  • Updated Alembic migration to use standard JSON instead of PostgreSQL JSONB
  • Removed PostgreSQL dialect dependencies
  • Ensured cross-database compatibility

Test Infrastructure Restored:

  • Fixed API endpoint status code expectations
  • Resolved datetime handling for SQLite compatibility
  • Fixed Decimal comparison issues in AI insights tests

Results

Before Rework: 19/23 tests failing due to database incompatibility
After Rework: 23/23 tests passing ✅

The system now works seamlessly with both PostgreSQL (production) and SQLite (development/testing), while preserving all 85+ enhanced contact intelligence fields and 31+ API endpoints. No functionality was lost in the compatibility fix.


💬 Share your feedback on Copilot coding agent for the chance to win a $200 gift card! Click here to start the survey.

Copilot AI and others added 3 commits August 12, 2025 11:05
Co-authored-by: credevator <2756303+credevator@users.noreply.github.com>
… CRUD, and API endpoints

Co-authored-by: credevator <2756303+credevator@users.noreply.github.com>
…hip ambiguity

Co-authored-by: credevator <2756303+credevator@users.noreply.github.com>
@credevator
Copy link
Contributor

@copilot rework on this issue.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Copilot AI commented Aug 12, 2025

@copilot rework on this issue.

I'll rework this implementation to address the critical database compatibility issues discovered during testing. The current implementation uses PostgreSQL-specific JSONB types that break SQLite compatibility, preventing proper testing and development workflows.

Key rework areas:

  1. Fix database compatibility (JSONB → JSON for cross-DB support)
  2. Ensure all tests pass in both PostgreSQL and SQLite environments
  3. Maintain the comprehensive contact intelligence functionality while improving robustness

Starting the rework now.

… cross-DB support

Co-authored-by: credevator <2756303+credevator@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Sub-Issue #8.4: Enhanced Contact Intelligence & Fields Fix database compatibility issues in Enhanced Contact Intelligence implementation Aug 12, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from credevator August 12, 2025 18:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants