Skip to content

Conversation

@mmkekic
Copy link

@mmkekic mmkekic commented Apr 30, 2019

This notebook demonstrates output of esmeralda, focused on paolina tracks

@jahernando
Copy link

Dear Marija,

The NB is quite illustrative and does a good fraction of the energy scale calibration and blob ID efficiency analyses.

Some comments:

  1. We should try to follow the policy that the NB cells should be mostly call to functions. In this sense. I will propose to move some of the code in the cells to modules. For example, a module ana_esmeralda.py, to locate filtering, and energy functions in a RoI, and some nice plotting and legends on the e-resolution histograms. In the NB calls should be a minimal number of operations and mostly call to these functions.

  2. I will say that maybe we need at least 3 NBs.

    2.a) One NB for the energy scale, the energy fits and finally the energy scale function, and how linear it is. Some final resolution of the relevant peaks as a result

    2.b) One NB for blob ID. (resume the energy calibration function in one function). The energy blob1 (blob2) distribution and energy blob1 (blob2) vs E. And the E blob2 (b lob2) distribution int he RoI and in the side-bands of the RoI. Here it will be nice to provide a FoM for example the number of events with 2-e vs 1-e in the RoI of the Tl-double escape peak. Most of this is already in the current NB.

    3.b) A control NB of Esmeralda. It would contain a plot with the efficiency vs the esmeralda cuts (include a final one of 1 track only). And the distribution of all (or most) of the variables in the different DF of the Esmeralda output.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants