generated from nginx/template-repository
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 95
NLB-6564: Updated NIGNXaaS dataplane change log with version information #632
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
xynicole
wants to merge
2
commits into
main
Choose a base branch
from
nlb-6564
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| title: "Module Changelog" | ||
| weight: 950 | ||
| toc: true | ||
| url: /nginxaas/azure/module-changelog/ | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Learn about the modules supported by the latest versions of F5 NGINX as a Service for Azure. | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ## July 10, 2025 | ||
|
|
||
| ### Stable | ||
|
|
||
| {{<bootstrap-table "table table-bordered table-striped table-responsive table-sm">}} | ||
|
|
||
| | Name | Version | Description | | ||
| |------------------------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------| | ||
| | app-protect-module-plus | 33+5.264.0-1 | App-Protect package for Nginx Plus, includes all of the default files and examples. NGINX App Protect provides web application firewall (WAF) security protection for your web applications, including OWASP Top 10 attacks. | | ||
| | app-protect-plugin | 6.9.0-1 | NGINX App Protect plugin | | ||
| | nginx-agent | 1.19.15-1795423089 | NGINX Agent - Management for NGINXaaS | | ||
| | nginx-plus | 1.27.2 (nginx-plus-r33-p2) | NGINX Plus, provided by Nginx, Inc. | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-appprotect | 33+5.264.0-1 | NGINX Plus app protect dynamic module version 5.264.0 | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-geoip2 | 33+3.4-1 | NGINX Plus 3rd-party GeoIP2 dynamic modules | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-headers-more | 33+0.37-1 | NGINX Plus 3rd-party headers-more dynamic module | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-image-filter | 33-1 | NGINX Plus image filter dynamic module | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-lua | 33+0.10.27-1 | NGINX Plus 3rd-party Lua dynamic modules | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-ndk | 33+0.3.3-1 | NGINX Plus 3rd-party NDK dynamic module | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-njs | 33+0.8.9-1 | NGINX Plus njs dynamic modules | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-otel | 33+0.1.0-1 | NGINX Plus OpenTelemetry dynamic module | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-xslt | 33-1 | NGINX Plus xslt dynamic module | | ||
| | Operating System | Ubuntu 22.04.5 | Jammy Jellyfish, provided by Canonical Ltd. | | ||
| {{</bootstrap-table>}} | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| ### Preview | ||
|
|
||
| {{<bootstrap-table "table table-bordered table-striped table-responsive table-sm">}} | ||
|
|
||
| | Name | Version | Description | | ||
| |------------------------------------------|--------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------| | ||
| | app-protect-module-plus | 33+5.264.0-1 | App-Protect package for Nginx Plus, includes all of the default files and examples. NGINX App Protect provides web application firewall (WAF) security protection for your web applications, including OWASP Top 10 attacks. | | ||
| | app-protect-plugin | 6.9.0-1 | NGINX App Protect plugin | | ||
| | nginx-agent | 1.19.15-1795423089 | NGINX Agent - Management for NGINXaaS | | ||
| | nginx-plus | 1.27.2 (nginx-plus-r33-p2) | NGINX Plus, provided by Nginx, Inc. | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-appprotect | 33+5.264.0-1 | NGINX Plus app protect dynamic module version 5.264.0 | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-geoip2 | 33+3.4-1 | NGINX Plus 3rd-party GeoIP2 dynamic modules | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-headers-more | 33+0.37-1 | NGINX Plus 3rd-party headers-more dynamic module | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-image-filter | 33-1 | NGINX Plus image filter dynamic module | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-lua | 33+0.10.27-1 | NGINX Plus 3rd-party Lua dynamic modules | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-ndk | 33+0.3.3-1 | NGINX Plus 3rd-party NDK dynamic module | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-njs | 33+0.8.9-1 | NGINX Plus njs dynamic modules | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-otel | 33+0.1.0-1 | NGINX Plus OpenTelemetry dynamic module | | ||
| | nginx-plus-module-xslt | 33-1 | NGINX Plus xslt dynamic module | | ||
| | Operating System | Ubuntu 22.04.5 | Jammy Jellyfish, provided by Canonical Ltd. | | ||
| {{</bootstrap-table>}} | ||
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't mind that these entries are sorted alphabetically (it's a predictable ordering). I do feel we can organize this data a bit better - perhaps something along these lines:
Here's an alternative approach which doesn't add an extra column and retains width on the existing columns (I like this one better):
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think the layout proposed by @amudukutore is better but keep in mind that currently we need to work with the table limitations imposed by Hugo (so we can't join cells)
I know the engineering team is currently looking on improving the table options, but this is still in the kitchen.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
My proposal above was built using HTML tables to get the desired formatting (since github Markdown tables are fairly limited).
@JTorreG - do the current limitations imposed by Hugo impact our usage of HTML tables?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should not use raw HTML for anything, inc. tables.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be good to understand why we can't use HTML tables. Also, what options do we have for tables today? Are we stuck with github-flavored Markdown tables (and their limitations) or can we do better?