-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34.5k
test_runner: support custom message for expectFailure #61563
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Han5991
wants to merge
5
commits into
nodejs:main
Choose a base branch
from
Han5991:test-runner/support-getxfail-message
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+116
−4
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
5a15080
test_runner: support custom message for expectFailure
Han5991 13aedaa
doc: improve expectFailure example message
Han5991 cd8b5aa
test_runner: enhance expectFailure with validation support
Han5991 67a4a61
test_runner: enhance expectFailure with validation support
Han5991 b6060db
test_runner: alias assert.throws to fix lint error
Han5991 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ | ||
| 'use strict'; | ||
| const common = require('../common'); | ||
| const { test } = require('node:test'); | ||
| const { spawn } = require('child_process'); | ||
| const assert = require('node:assert'); | ||
|
|
||
| if (process.env.CHILD_PROCESS === 'true') { | ||
| test('fail with message string', { expectFailure: 'reason string' }, () => { | ||
| assert.fail('boom'); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('fail with message object', { expectFailure: { message: 'reason object' } }, () => { | ||
| assert.fail('boom'); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('fail with validation regex', { expectFailure: { with: /boom/ } }, () => { | ||
| assert.fail('boom'); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('fail with validation object', { expectFailure: { with: { message: 'boom' } } }, () => { | ||
| assert.fail('boom'); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('fail with validation class', { expectFailure: { with: assert.AssertionError } }, () => { | ||
| assert.fail('boom'); | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('fail with validation error (wrong error)', { expectFailure: { with: /bang/ } }, () => { | ||
| assert.fail('boom'); // Should result in real failure because error doesn't match | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| test('unexpected pass', { expectFailure: true }, () => { | ||
| // Should result in real failure because it didn't fail | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| } else { | ||
| const child = spawn(process.execPath, ['--test-reporter', 'tap', __filename], { | ||
| env: { ...process.env, CHILD_PROCESS: 'true' }, | ||
| stdio: 'pipe', | ||
| }); | ||
|
|
||
| let stdout = ''; | ||
| child.stdout.setEncoding('utf8'); | ||
| child.stdout.on('data', (chunk) => { stdout += chunk; }); | ||
|
|
||
| child.on('close', common.mustCall((code) => { | ||
| // We expect exit code 1 because 'unexpected pass' and 'wrong error' should fail the test run | ||
| assert.strictEqual(code, 1); | ||
|
|
||
| // Check outputs | ||
| assert.match(stdout, /# EXPECTED FAILURE reason string/); | ||
| assert.match(stdout, /# EXPECTED FAILURE reason object/); | ||
| assert.match(stdout, /not ok \d+ - fail with validation error \(wrong error\)/); | ||
| assert.match(stdout, /not ok \d+ - unexpected pass/); | ||
| })); | ||
| } |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I like these field names the most compared to all the other ideas 👍🏾. Put it in the proposal?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(i only just learned that pressing the
commentbutton is not enough. you have to then submit the comment. this is a really bad GitHub UX)There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The following are equivalent, yes?