Fix implicit framework defines (NET6_0, NET6_0_OR_GREATER) not being defined#308
Open
Fix implicit framework defines (NET6_0, NET6_0_OR_GREATER) not being defined#308
Conversation
- Explicitly set DisableImplicitFrameworkDefines=false in Platforms.targets - This ensures Microsoft.NET.Sdk adds implicit framework defines like NET6_0, NET6_0_OR_GREATER, etc. - Add test to verify implicit framework defines work correctly for net8.0 and net8.0-windows Co-authored-by: clairernovotny <1427284+clairernovotny@users.noreply.github.com>
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Fix NET6_0 constants not properly defined for Xamarin.Forms
Fix implicit framework defines (NET6_0, NET6_0_OR_GREATER) not being defined
Nov 1, 2025
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR enables implicit framework defines (like NET8_0, NET8_0_OR_GREATER, NET8_0_WINDOWS) from the Microsoft.NET.Sdk to work correctly alongside the custom defines provided by MSBuild.Sdk.Extras. Previously, these standard SDK defines were being disabled.
Key changes:
- Explicitly sets
DisableImplicitFrameworkDefinestofalseto ensure Microsoft.NET.Sdk adds its standard framework defines - Adds a test project to verify that implicit framework defines are working correctly
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| Source/MSBuild.Sdk.Extras/Build/Platforms.targets | Uncomments and modifies the DisableImplicitFrameworkDefines property to explicitly set it to false, ensuring Microsoft.NET.Sdk adds implicit framework defines |
| Tests/ImplicitFrameworkDefines/ImplicitFrameworkDefines.csproj | Adds test project that validates implicit framework defines work correctly by building for net8.0 and net8.0-windows |
| Tests/ImplicitFrameworkDefines/Class1.cs | Adds test class with preprocessor directives that will fail compilation if the required defines are missing |
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Issue #279: Implicit framework defines like
NET6_0andNET6_0_OR_GREATERwere not being defined for .NET 6+ projects, breaking conditional compilation and breaking top-level statements.Root Cause
DisableImplicitFrameworkDefineswas left uncommented (but inactive), creating ambiguity. When not explicitly set tofalse, the Microsoft.NET.Sdk's implicit define logic may be disabled, preventing defines likeNET6_0,NET6_0_OR_GREATER, and platform-specific constants from being added.Changes
DisableImplicitFrameworkDefines=falseto ensure SDK implicit defines are always generatedTests/ImplicitFrameworkDefines/to verify defines are present using#errordirectives that fail compilation if missingExample
With this fix, projects can now use:
And top-level statements work correctly in multi-targeted projects.
Warning
Firewall rules blocked me from connecting to one or more addresses (expand for details)
I tried to connect to the following addresses, but was blocked by firewall rules:
o57vsblobprodeus2125.blob.core.windows.netdotnet restore --no-dependencies /home/REDACTED/work/MSBuildSdkExtras/.codeql-scratch/dbs/csharp/working/011FD41CC6F94F07FDAE78E0AF58AFF4/missingpackages_workingdir --packages /home/REDACTED/work/MSBuildSdkExtras/.codeql-scratch/dbs/csharp/working/missingpackages /p:DisableImplicitNuGetFallbackFolder=true --verbosity normal --configfile /home/REDACTED/work/MSBuildSdkExtras/.codeql-scratch/dbs/csharp/working/nugetconfig/nuget.config --force(dns block)If you need me to access, download, or install something from one of these locations, you can either:
Original prompt
✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.