Fix build #6 by omeritzics · Pull Request #140 · omeritzics/Updatium

omeritzics · 2026-02-12T21:22:08Z

PR Type

Bug fix

Description

Fixed incorrect compilerOptions to kotlinOptions in Gradle configuration
Corrected ABI filter type comparison from enum to string name

Diagram Walkthrough

flowchart LR
  A["build.gradle.kts"] -->|Fix compilerOptions| B["Use kotlinOptions"]
  A -->|Fix ABI filter| C["Use filterType.name == ABI"]

File Walkthrough

Relevant files

Bug fix

build.gradle.kts `Fix Kotlin options and ABI filter comparison` android/app/build.gradle.kts Changed `compilerOptions` block to `kotlinOptions` for proper Kotlin compilation settings Updated ABI filter type comparison from enum reference to string name comparison using `filterType.name == "ABI"`	+2/-2

gemini-code-assist · 2026-02-12T21:22:22Z

Summary of Changes

Hello @omeritzics, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves build failures by updating the android/app/build.gradle.kts file. The changes address recent API modifications in the Android Gradle Plugin or Kotlin Gradle plugin, specifically concerning the configuration of Kotlin compiler options and the way ABI filters are accessed during the build process. These adjustments ensure the project can build successfully with the current toolchain.

Highlights

Build Configuration Update: Updated the android/app/build.gradle.kts file to reflect changes in Kotlin compiler options, switching from compilerOptions to kotlinOptions.
ABI Filter Access Adjustment: Modified the method of accessing ABI filters within the build.gradle.kts to use filterType.name == "ABI" for compatibility with updated Gradle plugin APIs.

Changelog

android/app/build.gradle.kts
- Updated Kotlin compiler options from compilerOptions to kotlinOptions to align with newer Gradle/Kotlin plugin syntax.
- Adjusted ABI filter logic from it.filterType == ABI to it.filterType.name == "ABI" for correct identification of ABI filters.

Activity

No specific activity has been recorded for this pull request since its creation.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	`/gemini review`	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	`/gemini summary`	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	`/gemini help`	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

github-actions · 2026-02-12T21:22:23Z

Dependency Review

✅ No vulnerabilities or license issues or OpenSSF Scorecard issues found.

Scanned Files

None

qodo-code-review · 2026-02-12T21:22:26Z

PR Compliance Guide 🔍

Below is a summary of compliance checks for this PR:

Security Compliance
🟢	No security concerns identified No security vulnerabilities detected by AI analysis. Human verification advised for critical code.
Ticket Compliance
⚪	🎫 No ticket provided Create ticket/issue
Codebase Duplication Compliance
⚪	Codebase context is not defined Follow the guide to enable codebase context checks.
Custom Compliance
🟢	Generic: Comprehensive Audit Trails Objective: To create a detailed and reliable record of critical system actions for security analysis and compliance. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Meaningful Naming and Self-Documenting Code Objective: Ensure all identifiers clearly express their purpose and intent, making code self-documenting Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Robust Error Handling and Edge Case Management Objective: Ensure comprehensive error handling that provides meaningful context and graceful degradation Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Secure Error Handling Objective: To prevent the leakage of sensitive system information through error messages while providing sufficient detail for internal debugging. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Secure Logging Practices Objective: To ensure logs are useful for debugging and auditing without exposing sensitive information like PII, PHI, or cardholder data. Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
	Generic: Security-First Input Validation and Data Handling Objective: Ensure all data inputs are validated, sanitized, and handled securely to prevent vulnerabilities Status: Passed Learn more about managing compliance generic rules or creating your own custom rules
Update

Compliance status legend

🟢 - Fully Compliant
🟡 - Partial Compliant
🔴 - Not Compliant
⚪ - Requires Further Human Verification
🏷️ - Compliance label

gemini-code-assist

Code Review

This pull request aims to fix build issues in the Gradle configuration. The change from compilerOptions to kotlinOptions is correct for configuring the Kotlin compiler. However, the fix for the ABI filter comparison is incorrect. The filterType from the API being used is a String, so accessing the .name property on it will cause a build failure. I've provided a suggestion to correct this comparison.

android/app/build.gradle.kts

qodo-code-review · 2026-02-12T21:23:28Z

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Latest suggestions up to ce424a6

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	Fix misplaced Kotlin DSL block Move the `kotlin { jvmToolchain(...) }` block outside the `android {}` block, as it is a top-level DSL element and its current placement will cause a build failure. android/app/build.gradle.kts [42-44] kotlin { jvmToolchain(17) } +android { + ... + + kotlinOptions { + jvmTarget = JavaVersion.VERSION_17.toString() + } + + ... +} + `[To ensure code accuracy, apply this suggestion manually]` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that the `kotlin { jvmToolchain(17) }` block is misplaced within the `android` block, which is a build-breaking error.	High
Incremental ^[*]	✅ ~~Fail fast on invalid version~~ Suggestion Impact: Replaced the silent fallback (?: 1L) with requireNotNull(...) and an explicit error message to fail fast on invalid flutterVersionCode. code diff: - val baseBuildNumber = flutterVersionCode.toLongOrNull() ?: 1L + val baseBuildNumber = requireNotNull(flutterVersionCode.toLongOrNull()) { + "Invalid flutter.versionCode='$flutterVersionCode' in local.properties; must be a number." + } Fail the build if `flutterVersionCode` is malformed instead of silently falling back to `1L` to prevent unintended version code regressions. android/app/build.gradle.kts [143] -val baseBuildNumber = flutterVersionCode.toLongOrNull() ?: 1L +val baseBuildNumber = requireNotNull(flutterVersionCode.toLongOrNull()) { + "Invalid flutter.versionCode='$flutterVersionCode' in local.properties; must be a number." +} `[Suggestion processed]` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that silently defaulting to `1L` for a malformed `flutterVersionCode` can cause version downgrade issues, and proposes failing the build instead, which is a much more robust approach.	Medium
Incremental ^[*]	✅ ~~Clamp to Play version limits~~ Suggestion Impact: Replaced clamping upper bound from Int.MAX_VALUE.toLong() to a new maxPlayVersionCode constant set to 2_100_000_000L and used it in coerceIn. code diff: - val safeVersionCode = compressedCode.coerceIn(1L, Int.MAX_VALUE.toLong()) + val maxPlayVersionCode = 2_100_000_000L + val safeVersionCode = compressedCode.coerceIn(1L, maxPlayVersionCode) Clamp the computed version code to the Google Play Store's practical upper bound of 2,100,000,000 instead of `Int.MAX_VALUE`. android/app/build.gradle.kts [145-146] -val safeVersionCode = compressedCode.coerceIn(1L, Int.MAX_VALUE.toLong()) +val maxPlayVersionCode = 2_100_000_000L +val safeVersionCode = compressedCode.coerceIn(1L, maxPlayVersionCode) output.versionCode.set(safeVersionCode.toInt()) `[Suggestion processed]` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 __ Why: The suggestion correctly points out that the Google Play Store's maximum version code is lower than `Int.MAX_VALUE`, making the proposed clamping more accurate for preventing potential app store rejections.	Low
Update

Previous suggestions

✅ Suggestions up to commit 4c6f0af

Category	Suggestion	Impact
Possible issue	✅ ~~Remove stray duplicated build logic~~ Suggestion Impact: The commit removed the duplicated, out-of-scope leftover versionCode override block after the androidComponents closure, preventing the Gradle script from failing (and additionally improved version code parsing/safety). code diff: - } - } -} - val baseBuildNumber = flutterVersionCode.toLong() - val compressedCode = (baseBuildNumber % 100000) * 100 + abiVersionCode - (output as ApkVariantOutputImpl).versionCodeOverride = compressedCode.toInt() } Remove the leftover, duplicated build logic from lines 150-153, which will cause the Gradle script to fail. android/app/build.gradle.kts [150-153] androidComponents { onVariants { variant -> variant.outputs.forEach { output -> val abiFilter = output.filters.find { it.filterType == com.android.build.api.variant.VariantOutputConfiguration.FilterType.ABI } val abiVersionCode = abiFilter?.identifier?.let { abiCodes[it] } if (abiVersionCode != null) { // Create a version code within Android limits (max 2100000000) // Use: (YYMMDDHH % 100000) * 100 + ABI to stay well under limits val baseBuildNumber = flutterVersionCode.toLong() val compressedCode = (baseBuildNumber % 100000) * 100 + abiVersionCode output.versionCode.set(compressedCode.toInt()) } } } } - val baseBuildNumber = flutterVersionCode.toLong() - val compressedCode = (baseBuildNumber % 100000) * 100 + abiVersionCode - (output as ApkVariantOutputImpl).versionCodeOverride = compressedCode.toInt() - } Suggestion importance[1-10]: 10 __ Why: This suggestion correctly identifies leftover code from a refactoring that will cause a build failure because it is syntactically incorrect and references variables that are out of scope.	High
Incremental ^[*]	✅ ~~Prevent version code parsing/overflow~~ Suggestion Impact: Replaced toLong() with toLongOrNull() fallback to 1L and added coerceIn clamping before converting to Int for output.versionCode. code diff: - val baseBuildNumber = flutterVersionCode.toLong() + val baseBuildNumber = flutterVersionCode.toLongOrNull() ?: 1L val compressedCode = (baseBuildNumber % 100000) * 100 + abiVersionCode - output.versionCode.set(compressedCode.toInt()) + val safeVersionCode = compressedCode.coerceIn(1L, Int.MAX_VALUE.toLong()) + output.versionCode.set(safeVersionCode.toInt()) Use `toLongOrNull()` to safely parse `flutterVersionCode` and add clamping to prevent potential crashes from invalid version codes or overflow. android/app/build.gradle.kts [143-145] -val baseBuildNumber = flutterVersionCode.toLong() +val baseBuildNumber = flutterVersionCode.toLongOrNull() ?: 1L val compressedCode = (baseBuildNumber % 100000) * 100 + abiVersionCode -output.versionCode.set(compressedCode.toInt()) +val safeVersionCode = compressedCode.coerceIn(1L, Int.MAX_VALUE.toLong()) +output.versionCode.set(safeVersionCode.toInt()) `[Suggestion processed]` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies a potential `NumberFormatException` if `flutterVersionCode` is not a valid number and proposes a robust fix using `toLongOrNull()`, which prevents the build from crashing.	Low

✅ Suggestions up to commit 53a7db1

Category	Suggestion	Impact
General	✅ ~~Use modern Android Gradle Plugin API~~ Suggestion Impact: The commit did not migrate to androidComponents, but it did apply a small part of the suggestion by changing the ABI filter predicate from `it.filterType.name == "ABI"` to `it.filterType == "ABI"` within the existing `android.applicationVariants` block. code diff: android.applicationVariants.configureEach { val variant = this variant.outputs.forEach { output -> - val abiVersionCode = abiCodes[output.filters.find { it.filterType.name == "ABI" }?.identifier] + val abiVersionCode = abiCodes[output.filters.find { it.filterType == "ABI" }?.identifier] if (abiVersionCode != null) { Replace the deprecated `android.applicationVariants` API with the modern `androidComponents` API to improve build script stability and future-proof the code. android/app/build.gradle.kts [133-145] -android.applicationVariants.configureEach { - val variant = this +androidComponents.onVariants { variant -> variant.outputs.forEach { output -> -- val abiVersionCode = abiCodes[output.filters.find { it.filterType == ABI }?.identifier] -+ val abiVersionCode = abiCodes[output.filters.find { it.filterType.name == "ABI" }?.identifier] - if (abiVersionCode != null) { - // Create a version code within Android limits (max 2100000000) - // Use: (YYMMDDHH % 100000) * 100 + ABI to stay well under limits - val baseBuildNumber = flutterVersionCode.toLong() - val newVersionCode = (baseBuildNumber % 100000) * 100 + abiVersionCode - (output as ApkVariantOutputImpl).versionCodeOverride = newVersionCode.toInt() + val abiFilter = output.filters.find { it.filterType == "ABI" } + if (abiFilter != null) { + val abiVersionCode = abiCodes[abiFilter.identifier] + if (abiVersionCode != null) { + // Create a version code within Android limits (max 2100000000) + // Use: (YYMMDDHH % 100000) * 100 + ABI to stay well under limits + val baseBuildNumber = flutterVersionCode.toLong() + val newVersionCode = (baseBuildNumber % 100000) * 100 + abiVersionCode + output.versionCode.set(newVersionCode.toInt()) + } } } } `[Suggestion processed]` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 __ Why: The suggestion correctly identifies the use of a deprecated `android.applicationVariants` API and proposes migrating to the modern `androidComponents` API, which is a significant improvement for future compatibility and maintainability.	Medium
General	✅ ~~Configure Kotlin compile options via tasks API~~ Suggestion Impact: The kotlinOptions jvmTarget configuration was removed and replaced with Kotlin toolchain configuration (kotlin { jvmToolchain(17) }), changing how the Kotlin JVM target is set, though not using the suggested tasks.withType() pattern. code diff: - kotlinOptions { - jvmTarget = JavaVersion.VERSION_17.toString() + kotlin { + jvmToolchain(17) } Move the `kotlinOptions` configuration into a `tasks.withType()` block to align with a different configuration pattern for Kotlin projects. android/app/build.gradle.kts [42-44] -kotlinOptions { - jvmTarget = JavaVersion.VERSION_17.toString() +import org.jetbrains.kotlin.gradle.tasks.KotlinCompile +... +tasks.withType<KotlinCompile>().configureEach { + kotlinOptions { + jvmTarget = JavaVersion.VERSION_17.toString() + } } Suggestion importance[1-10]: 3 __ Why: The suggestion proposes an alternative way to configure Kotlin options, but the existing code within the `android` block is a valid and common practice, so this change is more of a stylistic preference than a necessary correction.	Low
Possible issue	✅ ~~Pin Kotlin to JDK 17~~ Suggestion Impact: Updated the Gradle Kotlin configuration to use jvmToolchain(17) instead of setting kotlinOptions.jvmTarget. code diff: - kotlinOptions { - jvmTarget = JavaVersion.VERSION_17.toString() + kotlin { + jvmToolchain(17) } Replace `kotlinOptions.jvmTarget` with `kotlin { jvmToolchain(17) }` to reliably pin the Kotlin compiler to JDK 17 and ensure consistent build behavior. android/app/build.gradle.kts [42-44] -kotlinOptions { - jvmTarget = JavaVersion.VERSION_17.toString() +kotlin { + jvmToolchain(17) } `[Suggestion processed]` Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 __ Why: The suggestion correctly recommends using `jvmToolchain` which is the modern best practice for ensuring a consistent JDK is used for Kotlin compilation, improving build reliability over just setting `jvmTarget`.	Medium

android/app/build.gradle.kts

Co-authored-by: qodo-code-review[bot] <151058649+qodo-code-review[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

android/app/build.gradle.kts

Co-authored-by: qodo-code-review[bot] <151058649+qodo-code-review[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

omeritzics · 2026-02-12T22:10:10Z

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Latest suggestions up to 4c6f0af
Category **Suggestion ** Impact
Possible issue
Remove stray duplicated build logic

High
Incremental [*]
✅ Prevent version code parsing/overflow

Low
* [ ]  Update
Previous suggestions

✅ Suggestions up to commit 53a7db1

Running Gradle task 'assembleNormalDebug'...
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:153:9: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:154:5: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:155:1: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:158:1: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:158:14: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:159:5: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:159:26: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:159:27: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:159:28: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:159:68: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:159:69: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:160:1: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:162:1: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:162:9: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:163:5: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:163:12: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:163:14: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:163:15: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:163:20: Unexpected symbol
e: file:///home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts:164:1: Unexpected symbol

FAILURE: Build failed with an exception.

Where:
Build file '/home/runner/work/Updatium/Updatium/android/app/build.gradle.kts' line: 153
What went wrong:
Script compilation errors:

Line 153: }
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 154: }
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 155: }
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 158: dependencies {
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 158: dependencies {
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 159: coreLibraryDesugaring("com.android.tools:desugar_jdk_libs:2.1.5")
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 159: coreLibraryDesugaring("com.android.tools:desugar_jdk_libs:2.1.5")
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 159: coreLibraryDesugaring("com.android.tools:desugar_jdk_libs:2.1.5")
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 159: coreLibraryDesugaring("com.android.tools:desugar_jdk_libs:2.1.5")
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 159: coreLibraryDesugaring("com.android.tools:desugar_jdk_libs:2.1.5")
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 159: coreLibraryDesugaring("com.android.tools:desugar_jdk_libs:2.1.5")
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 160: }
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 162: flutter {
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 162: flutter {
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 163: source = "../.."
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 163: source = "../.."
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 163: source = "../.."
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 163: source = "../.."
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 163: source = "../.."
^ Unexpected symbol

Line 164: }
^ Unexpected symbol

20 errors

What's happened there?

android/app/build.gradle.kts

Co-authored-by: qodo-code-review[bot] <151058649+qodo-code-review[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

android/app/build.gradle.kts

Co-authored-by: qodo-code-review[bot] <151058649+qodo-code-review[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>

omeritzics · 2026-02-12T22:19:02Z

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Latest suggestions up to ce424a6
Category **Suggestion ** Impact
Possible issue
Fix misplaced Kotlin DSL block

Move the kotlin { jvmToolchain(...) } block outside the android {} block, as it is a top-level DSL element and its current placement will cause a build failure.

android/app/build.gradle.kts [42-44]
 kotlin {
     jvmToolchain(17)
 }
 
+android {
+    ...
+
+    kotlinOptions {
+        jvmTarget = JavaVersion.VERSION_17.toString()
+    }
+
+    ...
+}
+
[To ensure code accuracy, apply this suggestion manually]
Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

__

Why: The suggestion correctly identifies that the kotlin { jvmToolchain(17) } block is misplaced within the android block, which is a build-breaking error.
High
Incremental [*]
Fail fast on invalid version

Medium
✅ Clamp to Play version limits

Low
* [ ]  Update
Previous suggestions

✅ Suggestions up to commit 4c6f0af

✅ Suggestions up to commit 53a7db1

Please implement kotlin {
jvmToolchain(17)
}

+android {

...
kotlinOptions {

   jvmTarget = JavaVersion.VERSION_17.toString()

}
...
+}

Fix build #6

53a7db1

qodo-code-review bot added the Review effort 1/5 label Feb 12, 2026

gemini-code-assist bot reviewed Feb 12, 2026

View reviewed changes