Skip to content

(docs) Add burn period notice to validator guide#689

Merged
joellidin merged 1 commit intodevfrom
feat/update-docs
Jan 21, 2026
Merged

(docs) Add burn period notice to validator guide#689
joellidin merged 1 commit intodevfrom
feat/update-docs

Conversation

@joellidin
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

@joellidin joellidin commented Jan 21, 2026

Add 100% burn period notification to docs/validator.md to align with
other documentation files. This completes the documentation update to
reflect the transition period after Covenant72B training.

  • Inform validators are burning 100% of emissions
  • Link to neurons/burn.py implementation
  • Note miner gradients are not being evaluated
  • Reference upcoming Templar: Crusades announcement

Description

Related Issue(s)

  • Closes #[issue number]

Type of Change

  • Feature (adding new functionality)
  • Fix (resolving a bug or issue)
  • Docs (documentation updates)
  • Refactor (code changes that don't affect functionality)
  • Maintenance (dependency updates or other maintenance)
  • Tests (adding or improving tests)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature with incompatible API changes)
  • Other: _____

Branch Naming

  • My branch follows the project's naming convention (e.g., feature/add-new-capability)

Commit Messages

  • My commits are small, atomic, and have proper commit messages
  • Commit messages are in imperative mood with a capitalized summary under 50 chars

Code Quality

  • I've performed a self-review of my code
  • I've added appropriate docstrings following the project's conventions
  • I've added proper logging where necessary (without trailing periods)
  • I've applied linting and formatting with Ruff
  • My code generates no new warnings

Testing

  • I've added tests for new functionality or bug fixes
  • All tests pass locally with my changes
  • Test coverage has not decreased

Documentation

  • I've updated documentation to reflect my changes
  • I've updated comments in hard-to-understand areas

If this is a breaking change

Screenshots/Examples

Additional Notes

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • Documentation
    • Introduced 100% Burn Period status (January 2026) clarifying that miners are not being evaluated and no emissions are distributed
    • Documented Covenant72B (72B parameters) training completion
    • Previewed upcoming Templar: Crusades competition system where training implementations are evaluated on target hardware with emissions awarded to fastest implementations

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Add 100% burn period notification to docs/validator.md to align with
other documentation files. This completes the documentation update to
reflect the transition period after Covenant72B training.

- Inform validators are burning 100% of emissions
- Link to neurons/burn.py implementation
- Note miner gradients are not being evaluated
- Reference upcoming Templar: Crusades announcement
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 21, 2026

Walkthrough

Documentation files updated across the repository with warning banners announcing a 100% Burn Period as of January 2026, Covenant72B training completion, and the upcoming Templar: Crusades competition system. No functional code changes; purely informational content additions.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Status Updates
README.md, docs/README.md, docs/miner.md, docs/validator.md
Added warning banners and status announcements indicating 100% Burn Period active, Covenant72B training phase, and reference to Templar: Crusades competition system. No functional or logic changes; content-only updates.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A burn period gleams, the docs now say,
No emissions flow on this quiet day,
Covenant's trained, the Crusade awaits,
Through warnings and banners we seal our fates! 📜✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title specifically references adding a burn period notice to the validator guide, which aligns with the primary change of adding documentation to docs/validator.md.
Description check ✅ Passed The description provides a clear summary of changes and their purpose, though the template checklist items remain unchecked rather than properly completed.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Jan 21, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (57.69%) is below the target coverage (85.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##              dev     #689   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   57.69%   57.69%           
=======================================
  Files          27       27           
  Lines        4990     4990           
=======================================
  Hits         2879     2879           
  Misses       2111     2111           
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@joellidin joellidin merged commit 0cd887e into dev Jan 21, 2026
7 of 8 checks passed
@joellidin joellidin deleted the feat/update-docs branch January 21, 2026 12:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant