Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 1: Workflow does not contain permissions#1
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 1: Workflow does not contain permissions#1
Conversation
…n permissions Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA top-level Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Potential fix for https://github.com/oopsio/peel/security/code-scanning/1
In general, fix this by explicitly declaring a
permissionsblock with the minimal required scopes, either at the workflow root (applies to all jobs) or under the specific job. This workflow only needs to read repository contents foractions/checkoutand does not interact with PRs, issues, or other resources, socontents: readis sufficient.The single best fix with minimal functional impact is to add a workflow-level
permissionsblock right under theon:block in.github/workflows/build.yml. This will apply to thebuildjob and any future jobs that don’t override permissions. The block should setcontents: read, which matches the recommended minimal starting point and is enough foractions/checkout@v4. No other steps require repository write permissions; uploading artifacts usesactions/upload-artifactand does not use repository contents write access.Concretely, in
.github/workflows/build.yml, insert:between the
on:section (lines 3–7) and thejobs:section (line 9). No imports or additional definitions are required because this is a GitHub Actions workflow YAML configuration, not application code.Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.
Summary by CodeRabbit