Skip to content

Conversation

@beeme1mr
Copy link
Member

Fixes the br element so it doesn't break the doc build.

open-feature/openfeature.dev#1323

Signed-off-by: Michael Beemer <beeme1mr@users.noreply.github.com>
@beeme1mr beeme1mr requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2026 20:06
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @beeme1mr, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a critical documentation build failure by standardizing the HTML line break tag usage within the observability appendix. The change ensures that the documentation compiles without errors by replacing non-standard </br> tags with the correct self-closing <br /> format, thereby improving the reliability of the documentation generation process.

Highlights

  • Documentation Build Fix: Corrected invalid HTML line break tags (</br>) to valid self-closing tags (<br />) within the specification/appendix-d-observability.md file. This change resolves an issue that was causing the documentation build to fail.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly fixes invalid <br> tags in the observability appendix markdown file, which resolves a documentation build issue. I've suggested a further improvement to enhance the readability and semantic structure of the tables by using HTML lists (<ul>/<li>) instead of <br /> tags for items within table cells. This will make the markdown source easier to maintain.

Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Beemer <beeme1mr@users.noreply.github.com>
@beeme1mr beeme1mr closed this Jan 23, 2026
@beeme1mr beeme1mr deleted the beeme1mr-patch-2 branch January 23, 2026 20:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants