-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 253
8347129: cpuset cgroups controller is required for no good reason #3109
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
8347129: cpuset cgroups controller is required for no good reason #3109
Conversation
Backport-of: be245be258cda7e06366b4051eec24ad6df04f20
|
👋 Welcome back antonvoznia! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into |
|
@antonvoznia This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks. After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be: You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed. At the time when this comment was updated there had been 12 new commits pushed to the
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details. As you do not have Committer status in this project an existing Committer must agree to sponsor your change. ➡️ To flag this PR as ready for integration with the above commit message, type |
|
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
|
This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit. |
|
|
|
/approval request Clean backport, tested locally and with GHA Sanity Checks. Few tests failed, but it's not related to the backport. |
|
@antonvoznia |
|
I'm pretty sure the test fails because of JDK-8370492 on F43. JDK-8282684 is the reason why it doesn't show up for JDK 17+ (i.e. isn't tested there, but the issue exists). |
|
@jerboaa thank you for the note. In my case the test failed The test expects one active processor count, but the actual value is two: Does the cpushare affect the active processor count number? |
For JDK 17 and below it does, yes. It's using |
|
@jerboaa I see, thanks |
|
/integrate |
|
@antonvoznia |
|
/sponsor |
|
Going to push as commit 9b9babc.
Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts. |
|
@phohensee @antonvoznia Pushed as commit 9b9babc. 💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored. |
Hi all,
Clean backport of JDK-8347129
Ran test locally on Fedora 43 arm, under
test/hotspot/jtreg/containers/Without the fix:
With the fix:
Test
containers/docker/TestCPUAwareness.javafails because of JDK-8282684.I also encountered this issue In JDK17.
Test
containers/docker/TestPids.javafails in JDK21 and JDK17 as well where the fix persists already.GHA Sanity Checks passed
Progress
Warning
8347129: cpuset cgroups controller is required for no good reasonIssue
Reviewing
Using
gitCheckout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3109/head:pull/3109$ git checkout pull/3109Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/3109$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev.git pull/3109/headUsing Skara CLI tools
Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 3109View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 3109Using diff file
Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk11u-dev/pull/3109.diff
Using Webrev
Link to Webrev Comment