Skip to content

Conversation

@elifaslan1
Copy link
Contributor

@elifaslan1 elifaslan1 commented Nov 11, 2025

Clean backport.The crash occurs when a virtual call is devirtualized late. Inliningis not attempted then. So no new inlining diagnostic message isproduced which causes the assert failure. There's some valuable information that can be reported though (the call is devirtualized).


Progress

  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8327741 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8327741: JVM crash in hotspot/share/opto/compile.cpp - failed: missing inlining msg (Bug - P4)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2464/head:pull/2464
$ git checkout pull/2464

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2464
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2464/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2464

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2464

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2464.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 11, 2025

👋 Welcome back elifaslan1! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 11, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 7df492627b933f48750985c26de69be3f86115cb 8327741: JVM crash in hotspot/share/opto/compile.cpp - failed: missing inlining msg Nov 11, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 11, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels Nov 11, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 11, 2025

⚠️ @elifaslan1 This change is now ready for you to apply for maintainer approval. This can be done directly in each associated issue or by using the /approval command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 11, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 11, 2025

Webrevs

@elifaslan1 elifaslan1 closed this Nov 19, 2025
@elifaslan1 elifaslan1 deleted the JDK-8327741 branch November 19, 2025 22:43
@elifaslan1 elifaslan1 restored the JDK-8327741 branch November 19, 2025 22:52
@elifaslan1 elifaslan1 deleted the JDK-8327741 branch November 19, 2025 22:58
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required rfr Pull request is ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant