Skip to content

Conversation

@rm-gh-8
Copy link
Contributor

@rm-gh-8 rm-gh-8 commented Nov 13, 2025

Backporting JDK-8358496: Concurrent reading from Socket with timeout executes sequentially. Updated SocketImpl so that the timeout applies to the total time waiting to acquire and read. Adds a new test to the existing java/net/Socket/Timeouts test. The test was minimally modified from the original commit for JDK version compatibility.

Ran GHA Sanity Checks (passed) and related test (passed).


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • JDK-8358496 needs maintainer approval

Issue

  • JDK-8358496: Concurrent reading from Socket with timeout executes sequentially (Bug - P4 - Requested)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2470/head:pull/2470
$ git checkout pull/2470

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/2470
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev.git pull/2470/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 2470

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 2470

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk21u-dev/pull/2470.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 13, 2025

👋 Welcome back rm-gh-8! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 13, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot changed the title Backport 7838321b74276e45b92c54904ea31ef70ed9e33f 8358496: Concurrent reading from Socket with timeout executes sequentially Nov 13, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 13, 2025

This backport pull request has now been updated with issue from the original commit.

@openjdk openjdk bot added backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required labels Nov 13, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed the clean Identical backport; no merge resolution required label Nov 13, 2025
@rm-gh-8 rm-gh-8 marked this pull request as ready for review November 13, 2025 21:51
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Nov 13, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Nov 13, 2025

Webrevs

@rm-gh-8
Copy link
Contributor Author

rm-gh-8 commented Nov 14, 2025

/approval request for backport of JDK-8358496: Concurrent reading from Socket with timeout executes sequentially.

Ran the updated and related tests on linux-x64, linux-aarch64, macos-aarch64 and windows-x64:

(All Passed) - make test TEST=test/jdk/java/net/Socket

Results are attached.
linux-aarch64-specific-test.log
linux-x64-specific-test.log
macos-aarch64-specific-test.log
windows-x64-specific-test.log

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 14, 2025

@rm-gh-8
8358496: The approval request has been created successfully.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received label Nov 14, 2025
Copy link
Member

@phohensee phohensee left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The only conflict I see is in Timeouts.java where the original commit deleted the import of ScheduledExecutorService. You can probably fix that.

@rm-gh-8
Copy link
Contributor Author

rm-gh-8 commented Nov 18, 2025

The ScheduledExecutorService class was re-introduced because the ForkJoinPool class doesn't support the schedule method in JDK 21. It was refactored to use the previous implementation for compatibility.

ForkJoinPool.commonPool().schedule(task, delay, TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS)

@rm-gh-8 rm-gh-8 requested a review from phohensee November 18, 2025 20:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approval Requires approval; will be removed when approval is received backport Port of a pull request already in a different code base rfr Pull request is ready for review

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants