Add unit tests for util functions

[GautamBytes]

What this PR does / Why we need it
The utility functions in pkg/webhook/util/util.go are responsible for configuring the webhook from environment variables. These functions previously lacked unit test coverage, making it hard to verify their behavior or prevent future regressions.

This PR adds unit tests to ensure this critical configuration logic is reliable and works as expected.

Key Scenarios Covered

• Functions correctly return a default value when an environment variable is not set.
• Functions correctly return the value from a set environment variable.
• The GetPort function is tested for both its default behavior and for correctly parsing a valid integer from the WEBHOOK_PORT environment variable.

[kruise-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign zmberg for approval by writing /assign @zmberg in a comment. For more information see:The Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 47.42%. Comparing base (00aae12) to head (3bf25d3).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #293      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   47.52%   47.42%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          63       65       +2     
  Lines        9799     9890      +91     
==========================================
+ Hits         4657     4690      +33     
- Misses       4585     4643      +58     
  Partials      557      557              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	47.42% <ø> (-0.11%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[GautamBytes]

@furykerry can you help me with why 'codecov/project' fails saying low coverage. it seems to be 100% as i can check on terminal

gautam@Gautam:/mnt/e/rollouts$ go tool cover -func=util.cover | grep "util.go"
github.com/openkruise/rollouts/pkg/webhook/util/util.go:26:     GetHost         100.0%
github.com/openkruise/rollouts/pkg/webhook/util/util.go:30:     GetNamespace    100.0%
github.com/openkruise/rollouts/pkg/webhook/util/util.go:37:     GetSecretName   100.0%
github.com/openkruise/rollouts/pkg/webhook/util/util.go:44:     GetServiceName  100.0%
github.com/openkruise/rollouts/pkg/webhook/util/util.go:51:     GetPort         100.0%
github.com/openkruise/rollouts/pkg/webhook/util/util.go:63:     GetCertDir      100.0%
github.com/openkruise/rollouts/pkg/webhook/util/util.go:70:     GetCertWriter   100.0%