-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 116
OCPBUGS-63190: e2e:hugepages: changing tests to use hugepages-allocator tool #1400
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OCPBUGS-63190: e2e:hugepages: changing tests to use hugepages-allocator tool #1400
Conversation
We want to use rhel9 as the image for the test pod which does not have libhugetlbfs.so. Instead we're using a small in-house tool allocate the hugepages and test functionality. Signed-off-by: Talor Itzhak <titzhak@redhat.com>
4.19 is using rhel9 Signed-off-by: Talor Itzhak <titzhak@redhat.com>
|
@Tal-or: This pull request explicitly references no jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/retest |
2 similar comments
|
/retest |
|
/retest |
|
/retitle ocpbugs-63190: e2e:hugepages: changing tests to use hugepages-allocator tool |
|
@Tal-or: This pull request references ocpbugs-63190 which is a valid jira issue. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/lgtm |
|
/retitle OCPBUGS-63190: e2e:hugepages: changing tests to use hugepages-allocator tool |
|
@Tal-or: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63190, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state. 3 validation(s) were run on this bug
Requesting review from QA contact: The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/retest |
2 similar comments
|
/retest |
|
/retest |
|
/verified by @mrniranjan |
|
@mrniranjan: This PR has been marked as verified by In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
/approve |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: Tal-or, yanirq The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
|
@Tal-or: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
@Tal-or: Jira Issue Verification Checks: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63190 Jira Issue OCPBUGS-63190 has been moved to the MODIFIED state and will move to the VERIFIED state when the change is available in an accepted nightly payload. 🕓 In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
|
Fix included in accepted release 4.21.0-0.nightly-2025-11-05-234508 |
We want to use rhel9 as the image for the test pod which does not have libhugetlbfs.so.
Instead we're using a small in-house tool allocate the hugepages
and test functionality.