Skip to content

Comments

Separate build trigger for operator and bundle#823

Merged
yuumasato merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
yuumasato:separate-build-and-bundle-builds-master
Feb 6, 2026
Merged

Separate build trigger for operator and bundle#823
yuumasato merged 1 commit intoopenshift:masterfrom
yuumasato:separate-build-and-bundle-builds-master

Conversation

@yuumasato
Copy link
Contributor

Let's not build both images all the time.
This leads to two snapshots whenever there is a build, and makes it a bit more difficult to find the correct one for release.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 11, 2025
Let's not build both images all the time.
This leads to two snapshots whenever there is a build, and makes it a
bit more difficult to find the correct one for release.
@yuumasato yuumasato force-pushed the separate-build-and-bundle-builds-master branch from 2ed1beb to 44c3e1e Compare December 11, 2025 12:09
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 11, 2025

@yuumasato: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@yuumasato yuumasato requested a review from Vincent056 December 12, 2025 11:24
Copy link
Contributor

@Vincent056 Vincent056 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could we use a different tag for the bundle image here

@yuumasato
Copy link
Contributor Author

could we use a different tag for the bundle image here

What is the motivation?

@yuumasato
Copy link
Contributor Author

Triggering the operator pipeline for bundle only related changes also lead to infinite nudges.
See #851, which was opened after #850 merged.

Copy link
Contributor

@Vincent056 Vincent056 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 9, 2026
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 9, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Vincent056, yuumasato

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [Vincent056,yuumasato]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@yuumasato yuumasato merged commit caca373 into openshift:master Feb 6, 2026
7 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants