Conversation
…pod-resize Pod level in place pod resize - alpha
…containerd-skip [KEP-4639] Remove image volume e2e test because CI has containerd < 2.1
Fix volume performance tests with performance constraints
update github.com/opencontainers/selinux to v1.13.0
* First version of batching w/out signatures. * First version of pod signatures. * Integrate batching with signatures. * Fix merge conflicts. * Fixes from self-review. * Test fixes. * Fix a bug that limited batches to size 2 Also add some new high-level logging and simplify the pod affinity signature. * Re-enable batching on perf tests for now. * fwk.NewStatus(fwk.Success) * Review feedback. * Review feedback. * Comment fix. * Two plugin specific unit tests.: * Add cycle state to the sign call, apply to topo spread. Also add unit tests for several plugi signature calls. * Review feedback. * Switch to distinct stats for hint and store calls. * Switch signature from string to []byte * Revert cyclestate in signs. Update node affinity. Node affinity now sorts all of the various nested arrays in the structure. CycleState no longer in signature; revert to signing fewer cases for pod spread. * hack/update-vendor.sh * Disable signatures when extenders are configured. * Update pkg/scheduler/framework/runtime/batch.go Co-authored-by: Maciej Skoczeń <87243939+macsko@users.noreply.github.com> * Update staging/src/k8s.io/kube-scheduler/framework/interface.go Co-authored-by: Maciej Skoczeń <87243939+macsko@users.noreply.github.com> * Review feedback. * Disable node resource signatures when extended DRA enabled. * Review feedback. * Update pkg/scheduler/framework/plugins/imagelocality/image_locality.go Co-authored-by: Maciej Skoczeń <87243939+macsko@users.noreply.github.com> * Update pkg/scheduler/framework/interface.go Co-authored-by: Maciej Skoczeń <87243939+macsko@users.noreply.github.com> * Update pkg/scheduler/framework/plugins/nodedeclaredfeatures/nodedeclaredfeatures.go Co-authored-by: Maciej Skoczeń <87243939+macsko@users.noreply.github.com> * Update pkg/scheduler/framework/runtime/batch.go Co-authored-by: Maciej Skoczeń <87243939+macsko@users.noreply.github.com> * Review feedback. * Fixes for review suggestions. * Add integration tests. * Linter fixes, test fix. * Whitespace fix. * Remove broken test. * Unschedulable test. * Remove go.mod changes. --------- Co-authored-by: Maciej Skoczeń <87243939+macsko@users.noreply.github.com>
…extual error messages
…Should(Succeed())
Update the procMount test expectations to match the intentional PSA policy relaxation introduced in commit e8bd3f6. As of Kubernetes 1.35+, Pod Security Admission Baseline policy allows UnmaskedProcMount for pods with user namespaces (hostUsers: false). This was an intentional change to support nested container use cases while maintaining security through user namespace isolation. The test "will fail to unmask proc mounts if not privileged" was written before this relaxation and expected Baseline level to reject UnmaskedProcMount. Since Baseline now allows it (for user namespace pods), the test needs to use Restricted level instead, which unconditionally blocks UnmaskedProcMount regardless of user namespace settings. Changes: - Change PSA level from Baseline to Restricted - Update test name to clarify it's testing Restricted level behavior - Update framework name from "proc-mount-baseline-test" to "proc-mount-restricted-test" Fixes the ci-crio-userns-e2e-serial test failure that started occurring when runtimes began reporting user namespace support. Signed-off-by: Sascha Grunert <sgrunert@redhat.com>
…-userns-validation test/e2e_node: Update procMount test to use Restricted PSA level
Fixes issue kubernetes#134023 where alpha API warnings were being logged when binary version (1.34.1) and emulation version (1.34) differed only in patch version. The issue was in api_enablement.go where the version comparison was using EqualTo() which compares all version components including patch versions. The fix changes the comparison to only check major.minor versions using version.MajorMinor(). Changes: - Modified version comparison logic in ApplyTo() method to only compare major.minor versions, not patch versions - Added comprehensive test cases to verify the fix works correctly - Tests confirm that warnings are still logged for different major/minor versions but not for different patch versions This prevents spurious warnings when emulation version is set to major.minor (e.g., 1.34) and binary version includes patch (e.g., 1.34.1).
…rnings-134023 Fix alpha API warnings for patch version differences
Signed-off-by: Aman Shrivastava <amanshrivastava118@gmail.com>
openshift-merge-robot
added
the
needs-rebase
openshift-ci-robot
added
the
backports/unvalidated-commits
openshift-ci
bot
added
the
do-not-merge/work-in-progress
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: jacobsee The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
jacobsee
force-pushed
the
rebase-1.35
branch
from
6044a25 to
10edd8b
Compare
|
/test e2e-aws-ovn-crun e2e-aws-crun-wasm k8s-e2e-gcp-ovn e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2 e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-1of2 |
1 similar comment
|
/test e2e-aws-ovn-crun e2e-aws-crun-wasm k8s-e2e-gcp-ovn e2e-aws-ovn-serial-1of2 e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-1of2 |
|
/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-1of2 |
|
/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-2of2 |
1 similar comment
|
/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-2of2 |
|
/retest-required |
|
/test e2e-aws-ovn-techpreview-serial-1of2 |
|
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 |
|
/payload 4.22 nightly blocking |
|
@neisw: trigger 14 job(s) of type blocking for the nightly release of OCP 4.22
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/a1531410-0823-11f1-96f3-8e307b3e82c7-0 trigger 5 job(s) of type blocking for the ci release of OCP 4.22
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/a1531410-0823-11f1-96f3-8e307b3e82c7-1 |
|
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 |
|
/retest |
|
@jacobsee: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 |
|
/payload 4.22 nightly blocking |
|
@jacobsee: trigger 14 job(s) of type blocking for the nightly release of OCP 4.22
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/126add30-08a7-11f1-98a7-c4f004d48fa3-0 trigger 5 job(s) of type blocking for the ci release of OCP 4.22
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/126add30-08a7-11f1-98a7-c4f004d48fa3-1 |
|
/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-ci-4.22-upgrade-from-stable-4.21-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade 10 |
|
@neisw: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/56112980-08ee-11f1-92d8-bc485a5a34e1-0 |
|
/payload-aggregate periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-conformance 10 |
|
@neisw: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/910f8c70-08ee-11f1-90dd-294b5b02017a-0 |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.22-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv4 periodic-ci-openshift-release-main-nightly-4.22-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6 |
|
@neisw: trigger 2 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/d062f1a0-08ee-11f1-8792-3dfed807434f-0 |
|
/payload-job periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-4.22-periodics-e2e-aks |
|
@neisw: trigger 1 job(s) for the /payload-(with-prs|job|aggregate|job-with-prs|aggregate-with-prs) command
See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/f70dc730-08ee-11f1-9394-9157c2b2cd9f-0 |
20 participants
No description provided.