CNV-64215: CQA doc bug for concise or direct language in Installing virt

[MirzWeiss]

Version(s):
Main, 4.20

Issue: CNV-64215

Link to docs preview

QE review:
N/A

[openshift-ci-robot]

@MirzWeiss: This pull request references CNV-64215 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
Main, 4.20

Issue: CNV-64215

Link to docs preview

QE review:
N/A

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Wed Aug 20 07:28:14 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://97810--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/virt/install/installing-virt.html
https://97810--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa-hcp/latest/virt/install/installing-virt.html
https://97810--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-rosa/latest/virt/install/installing-virt.html

[openshift-ci]

@MirzWeiss: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[openshift-ci-robot]

@MirzWeiss: This pull request references CNV-64215 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Version(s):
Main, 4.20

Issue: CNV-64215

Link to docs preview

QE review:
N/A

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[sjhala-ccs]

LGTM

[MirzWeiss]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@MirzWeiss: new pull request created: #97910

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[MirzWeiss]

/label CNV
/label enterprise-4.20

[openshift-ci]

@MirzWeiss: The label(s) /label enterprise-4.20 cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, ux-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, run-integration-tests, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, cloud-experts, cnv, dev-tools, distributed-tracing, ims, jira/valid-bug, merge-review-in-progress, merge-review-needed, mtc, multi-arch, oadp, ok-to-test, rhacs, rhv, sd-docs, serverless, service-mesh, sme-review-done, sme-review-needed, stability-fix-approved, staff-eng-approved, telco. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

In response to this:

/label CNV
/label enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[MirzWeiss]

/label enterprise-4.20

[openshift-ci]

@MirzWeiss: The label(s) /label enterprise-4.20 cannot be applied. These labels are supported: acknowledge-critical-fixes-only, platform/aws, platform/azure, platform/baremetal, platform/google, platform/libvirt, platform/openstack, ga, tide/merge-method-merge, tide/merge-method-rebase, tide/merge-method-squash, px-approved, docs-approved, qe-approved, ux-approved, no-qe, downstream-change-needed, rebase/manual, cluster-config-api-changed, run-integration-tests, approved, backport-risk-assessed, bugzilla/valid-bug, cherry-pick-approved, cloud-experts, cnv, dev-tools, distributed-tracing, ims, jira/valid-bug, merge-review-in-progress, merge-review-needed, mtc, multi-arch, oadp, ok-to-test, rhacs, rhv, sd-docs, serverless, service-mesh, sme-review-done, sme-review-needed, stability-fix-approved, staff-eng-approved, telco. Is this label configured under labels -> additional_labels or labels -> restricted_labels in plugin.yaml?

In response to this:

/label enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.