-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
CI: switch to common formalities workflow #8066
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI: switch to common formalities workflow #8066
Conversation
81d1053 to
d3db74c
Compare
|
NACK - this breaks workflows and custom checks necessary in this repo. |
|
Can you be more specific? |
|
These changes are integrated in the PR from the description (the one you commented in). It's not merged yet hence the failing check. Did I miss something specific? |
|
No - it pointed to main which was why I didn't find your amendments. |
|
on notice: @Ansuel |
BKPepe
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fixes: #7821
Switch to using the common formalities workflow defined in the actions-shared-workflows that include luci-specific exceptions. Fixes: openwrt#7821 Signed-off-by: George Sapkin <george@sapk.in>
d3db74c to
3ce1313
Compare
|
Parent PR merged and local formalities pass 🎉 |
|
Merged. Thanks @GeorgeSapkin ! |
Switch to using the common formalities workflow defined in the actions-shared-workflows that include luci-specific exceptions.
Depends on openwrt/actions-shared-workflows#61 (old formalities check does not pass this PR due to a missing script).
Fixes: #7821
CC: @aparcar, @systemcrash
TODO: