Both the left- and right-gunified forms of 𒋤 are under LAK233, not LAK235#47
Open
eggrobin wants to merge 1 commit intooracc:masterfrom
Hidden character warning
The head ref may contain hidden characters: "\ud808\udee4"
Open
Both the left- and right-gunified forms of 𒋤 are under LAK233, not LAK235#47eggrobin wants to merge 1 commit intooracc:masterfrom
eggrobin wants to merge 1 commit intooracc:masterfrom
Conversation
…laite forms are right-gunified.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There is no 𒋤 under LAK235, only LAK235 𒈲:
and indeed the glyph currently listed as LAK235^a in https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/listfontdata/lak/#235 is actually from the entry for LAK233—specifically, it is the one from 9078, 8—:
Of those citations, two (9078, 8 CT 5, 3, I2) are gunified on the right, but RTC 75R2 is gunified on the left (at least according to Thureau-Dangin’s copy, with the damage I cannot tell much from the photo), and transliterated as plain su₃, likewise, CT 3, 36, 104 has extra wedges on the left compared to 𒁍 in the same text.
The index form says « pass. in d. arch. T. ». Is it the ordinary form of su₃ in some styles? If so, it might not need to be a separate
@form.The Eblaite forms are gunified on the right, so they move up to the main sign.