Skip to content

gilgameš₂ is 𒄑𒉋𒂵𒈩; 𒄑𒉋𒂵𒎌 does not exist; gilgameš₄ is not needed.#48

Open
eggrobin wants to merge 1 commit intooracc:masterfrom
eggrobin:gilgamess
Open

gilgameš₂ is 𒄑𒉋𒂵𒈩; 𒄑𒉋𒂵𒎌 does not exist; gilgameš₄ is not needed.#48
eggrobin wants to merge 1 commit intooracc:masterfrom
eggrobin:gilgamess

Conversation

@eggrobin
Copy link
Contributor

@eggrobin eggrobin commented Dec 8, 2025

The current gilgameš₂(𒄑𒉋𒂵𒎌) in OSL is a straightforward typo (MEŠ instead of MES/MÈŠ); MZL p. 485 assigns gílgames/š to GIŠ-BÍL-GA-MES 𒄑𒉋𒂵𒈩 instead (and gìlgameš to GIŠ-NE-GA-MES 𒄑𒉈𒂵𒈩, which is what the OSL has for gilgameš₃).
The ePSD2 attestations of gilgameš₂ are mostly etcsl composites, so confirming on photos is a bit fiddly, but spot-checking a witness for the SKL (https://oracc.museum.upenn.edu/epsd2/Q000371.125) confirms that etcsl is using the same numbering as Borger here:
𒌉𒀭𒄑𒉋𒂵𒈩
from https://cdli.earth/artifacts/384786/reader/176756 clearly doesn’t end with 𒎌.

𒄑𒉋𒂵𒎌 is unattested, see George’s The Babylonian Gilgamesh Epic, pp. 71 sqq., and thus gets deprecated.

In 2a94a02, 𒄑𒉈𒂵𒈩 was added to the OSL, but as gilgameš₄. As discussed over email, gilgameš₄ should be withdrawn as a reading, and the ePSD2 corpus should be fixed to use gilgameš₂ instead.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant