Chore: label-gated auto-merge + PR template #4
Conversation
![chatgpt-codex-connector[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1144995?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 39951bcfcb
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
|
|
||
| on: | ||
| pull_request: | ||
| types: [opened, reopened, ready_for_review, labeled, synchronize] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The workflow only listens to opened, reopened, ready_for_review, labeled, and synchronize, so removing the automerge label never re-evaluates or disables an already-enabled auto-merge state. In practice, a PR can still auto-merge after the label is removed, which breaks the intended label gate and makes it hard to stop an in-flight auto-merge without manual API/UI intervention.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
| enable: | ||
| if: >- | ||
| github.event.pull_request.draft == false && | ||
| contains(join(github.event.pull_request.labels.*.name, ','), 'automerge') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The condition uses contains(join(...), 'automerge'), which performs a substring match on a concatenated string of label names; this also returns true for labels like no-automerge or automerge-blocked. That can enable auto-merge for PRs that do not actually carry the exact automerge label.
Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
1 participant
Adds a lightweight PR template (Reality check + risk + Codex checkbox) and a label-gated auto-merge workflow.
This keeps the slow-cook, low-intervention flow while still requiring CI to pass.