feat: Add Sensor.Community data destination#237
Open
fangfufu wants to merge 1 commit intopimoroni:mainfrom
Open
feat: Add Sensor.Community data destination#237fangfufu wants to merge 1 commit intopimoroni:mainfrom
fangfufu wants to merge 1 commit intopimoroni:mainfrom
Conversation
Implements a new data destination for uploading sensor readings to the Sensor.Community platform. This includes logic for formatting PM, temperature, pressure, and humidity data and making API requests.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implements a new data destination for uploading sensor readings to the Sensor.Community platform. This includes logic for formatting PM, temperature, pressure, and humidity data and making API requests.
This is very much a work in progress. If people like this, I am more than happy to tidy this up and work toward merging this in. This seems to be an issue that a few people encounter, i.e.
Other existing implementation: