Accessibility-first routing concept focused on clarity, trust cues, and real-world constraints (ramps/elevators/curb cuts/steepness).
Designed to reduce uncertainty for wheelchair users, seniors, travelers with luggage, and anyone needing barrier-free routes.
Role: UX / Product Designer (End-to-End)
Artifacts: 12+ screens · 3 iterations · 6 usability checks · 1 accessibility audit · taxonomy + component states
Tools: Figma, FigJam, Notion · (optional) Fusion 360 for physical-context reasoning
Case Study (Notion): https://giant-pantydraco-31a.notion.site/Access-Map-Repo-2d52674354cb808b921deee1c05c7eea?source=copy_link
Json code: taginfo.json
Figma Prototype & High-Fidelity UI Link: https://www.figma.com/design/5lvOC2vJ5BTFLxtgBJaiVM/Access-Map?node-id=0-1&t=jZ7IHGOJJarDRuVp-1
3D Tools Model (Fusion 360): https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5b2a9f57-8495-41ee-a8e7-a335377834c2
-
Case Study (Repo): docs/00-case-study.md
-
JD Alignment: docs/07-jd-alignment.md
-
IA + Taxonomy: docs/02-ia-taxonomy.md
-
Prototype Specs: docs/03-prototype-specs.md
-
Data Tags (JSON): data/taginfo.json
-
Orchestration Diagram (PNG): assets/diagrams/orchestration-diagram.png
-
Changelog: CHANGELOG.md
-
Accessibility Audit: docs/04-accessibility-audit.md
Mainstream maps often fail to reliably express accessibility. Users face:
- Uncertainty (stairs/elevator dependency/steep segments)
- Inconsistent signals (missing data, outdated tags)
- No decision support (confidence, fallback routes, “what could go wrong”)
Goal: Make accessibility visible, verifiable, and decision-friendly.
- Step-free filters and route options built for fast decision clarity
- Trust cues: confidence indicators + dependency warnings
- Fallback routes when signals are weak or a key accessibility feature fails (e.g., elevator outage)
- Structured labels for ramps/elevators/curb cuts/steepness/surface, etc.
- Designed to scale from prototype → future data ingestion/community verification
- Interaction states across search → route compare → guidance
- Reusable patterns to support consistency and handoff readiness
- Tradeoffs captured: accuracy vs detours vs interaction cost
- Edge cases covered: missing data, elevator outages, steep slopes
- Outputs: flows/IA, interaction states, hi-fi prototype, walkthrough-ready narrative artifact
- Customer outcomes (VOC): confidence to start a route + less mid-route surprises
README.md— overview + linkstaginfo.json— accessibility signal taxonomy used in the conceptorchestration-diagram.(png|svg)— routing + trust cue orchestration diagramLICENSE,.gitignore
Next planned repo upgrade (for “extreme shortlisting”):
/docscase study slices (research → IA/taxonomy → prototype specs → accessibility audit → impact metrics → JD alignment)
MIT