Skip to content

prakhardewangan2005-hash/AccessMap

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

63 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

AccessMap — Step-Free Navigation (UX + Product Design)

Accessibility-first routing concept focused on clarity, trust cues, and real-world constraints (ramps/elevators/curb cuts/steepness).
Designed to reduce uncertainty for wheelchair users, seniors, travelers with luggage, and anyone needing barrier-free routes.

Role: UX / Product Designer (End-to-End)
Artifacts: 12+ screens · 3 iterations · 6 usability checks · 1 accessibility audit · taxonomy + component states
Tools: Figma, FigJam, Notion · (optional) Fusion 360 for physical-context reasoning


Quick Links

Case Study (Notion): https://giant-pantydraco-31a.notion.site/Access-Map-Repo-2d52674354cb808b921deee1c05c7eea?source=copy_link

Json code: taginfo.json

Figma Prototype & High-Fidelity UI Link: https://www.figma.com/design/5lvOC2vJ5BTFLxtgBJaiVM/Access-Map?node-id=0-1&t=jZ7IHGOJJarDRuVp-1

3D Tools Model (Fusion 360): https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5b2a9f57-8495-41ee-a8e7-a335377834c2

Proof Docs


Problem

Mainstream maps often fail to reliably express accessibility. Users face:

  • Uncertainty (stairs/elevator dependency/steep segments)
  • Inconsistent signals (missing data, outdated tags)
  • No decision support (confidence, fallback routes, “what could go wrong”)

Goal: Make accessibility visible, verifiable, and decision-friendly.


What I Designed

1) Step-Free Route Planning

  • Step-free filters and route options built for fast decision clarity
  • Trust cues: confidence indicators + dependency warnings
  • Fallback routes when signals are weak or a key accessibility feature fails (e.g., elevator outage)

2) Accessibility Signal System (Taxonomy)

  • Structured labels for ramps/elevators/curb cuts/steepness/surface, etc.
  • Designed to scale from prototype → future data ingestion/community verification

3) State-Ready UI + Design System Thinking

  • Interaction states across search → route compare → guidance
  • Reusable patterns to support consistency and handoff readiness

Highlights (Proof)

  • Tradeoffs captured: accuracy vs detours vs interaction cost
  • Edge cases covered: missing data, elevator outages, steep slopes
  • Outputs: flows/IA, interaction states, hi-fi prototype, walkthrough-ready narrative artifact
  • Customer outcomes (VOC): confidence to start a route + less mid-route surprises

Repo Contents

  • README.md — overview + links
  • taginfo.json — accessibility signal taxonomy used in the concept
  • orchestration-diagram.(png|svg) — routing + trust cue orchestration diagram
  • LICENSE, .gitignore

Next planned repo upgrade (for “extreme shortlisting”):
/docs case study slices (research → IA/taxonomy → prototype specs → accessibility audit → impact metrics → JD alignment)


License

MIT

About

No description, website, or topics provided.

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors