Skip to content

Conversation

@pedrofurtado
Copy link

@pedrofurtado pedrofurtado commented Aug 4, 2021

@prodis 👍

the output of CI can be checked here (until PR merged): https://github.com/pedrofurtado/correios-cep/actions/runs/1095889282

@prodis
Copy link
Owner

prodis commented Aug 4, 2021

@pedrofurtado Thank you for your PR. But what is the motivation to move the CI from Travis to GitHub Actions?

@pedrofurtado
Copy link
Author

pedrofurtado commented Aug 4, 2021

Hi, @prodis ! The motivation and suggestion is because Github Actions have a great ecosystem of actions/plugins/and so on, better native integration with github repos (it's made by github itself, has "actions" tab in repo and so on) and a growing popularity and adoption, especially in open source projects. It's also free and works out-of-box very well 👍 🍻

@prodis
Copy link
Owner

prodis commented Aug 8, 2021

I see that GitHub Actions is trending, but you didn't mentioned any real advantage comparing to the current CI in Travis. In fact, the GitHub Actions configuration you proposed is missing the allowed failure Ruby versions and the cron jobs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants