Skip to content

fix(RHOAIENG-31076): Added project and updated version in .toml #884

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chipspeak
Copy link
Contributor

Issue link

Jira Link

What changes have been made

Added a [project] block in aid of PEP 517 builds of the CodeFlare SDK.

Verification steps

Checks

  • I've made sure the tests are passing.
  • Testing Strategy
    • Unit tests
    • Manual tests
    • Testing is not required for this change

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 14, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 14, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.47%. Comparing base (d467810) to head (6b887bd).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #884   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   92.47%   92.47%           
=======================================
  Files          24       24           
  Lines        1396     1396           
=======================================
  Hits         1291     1291           
  Misses        105      105           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Signed-off-by: Pat O'Connor <paoconno@redhat.com>
@chipspeak
Copy link
Contributor Author

/hold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 20, 2025
@chipspeak chipspeak marked this pull request as ready for review August 20, 2025 09:44
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Aug 20, 2025
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 20, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Aug 20, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: kryanbeane

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants