-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
RHCLOUD-45005: Use ResourceType/ReporterType in SchemaRepository and ResourceEvent #1332
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
snehagunta
wants to merge
4
commits into
project-kessel:main
from
snehagunta:RHCLOUD-45005-move-model-types-to-model
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8821bea
use Version tiny type for all version attributes
snehagunta e20dddf
Use TransactionId tiny type everywhere
snehagunta 0d37291
Add Version.Decrement() and fix missed schema test conversion
snehagunta 8bc5ab6
fix: use ver.Decrement() instead of hardcoded NewVersion(0) in test
snehagunta File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: project-kessel/inventory-api
Length of output: 19958
Resolve transaction ID inconsistency across the write path.
The resource model stores
*cmd.TransactionId(lines 251, 283) whileSave()receives and forwards a separate request-scopedtxidto the outbox (lines 269, 296). When a caller supplies an idempotency key, these diverge from the start. The retry logic (lines 188–191) compounds this by rewritingcmd.TransactionIdwithout updating the capturedtxid, causing the same operation to persist with different transaction IDs in the resource vs. outbox event stream. This breaks correlation between stored state and published events, compromising idempotency tracking and event replay.Either thread a single effective transaction ID through both the resource model and outbox calls, or explicitly split these into distinct idempotency key and outbox correlation ID concepts with clear naming to prevent future regressions.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents