Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Mar 24, 2026. It is now read-only.

docs: add remote MCP server section to README#52

Merged
hramezani merged 3 commits intomainfrom
hramezani/add-remote-mcp-docs
Feb 10, 2026
Merged

docs: add remote MCP server section to README#52
hramezani merged 3 commits intomainfrom
hramezani/add-remote-mcp-docs

Conversation

@hramezani
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Add documentation for the hosted remote MCP server as the recommended way to use Logfire MCP
  • Include separate configuration examples for US and EU regions to avoid copy-paste errors
  • Add region hints (logfire.pydantic.dev for US, logfire-eu.pydantic.dev for EU) to help users identify their region
  • Reorganize local setup instructions under a "Running Locally" section

Why

The remote MCP server is easier to set up and doesn't require users to manage a local process. Making it the first option in the README will help users get started faster.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Comment thread tests/README.md.jinja Outdated
Comment thread tests/README.md.jinja
@@ -1,7 +1,48 @@
# Pydantic Logfire MCP Server

This repository contains a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server with tools that can access the OpenTelemetry traces and
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should have text between heading sections.

Comment thread tests/README.md.jinja

This repository contains a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server with tools that can access the OpenTelemetry traces and
metrics you've sent to Pydantic Logfire.
## Remote MCP Server (Recommended)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should have a note about self hosted.

Comment thread tests/README.md.jinja Outdated
Comment on lines +42 to +45
## Running Locally

If you prefer to run the MCP server locally (for example, for offline use or custom configurations),
you can use this package instead.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We should set a warning and say that it's deprecated.

Add documentation for the hosted remote MCP server as the recommended
way to use Logfire MCP. This provides an easier setup experience for
users who don't need to run the server locally.

- Add Remote MCP Server section at the top of README
- Include separate configs for US and EU regions
- Add region hints to help users choose the correct endpoint
- Reorganize local setup under "Running Locally" section

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@hramezani hramezani force-pushed the hramezani/add-remote-mcp-docs branch from 65ca314 to 58264de Compare February 10, 2026 08:45
@hramezani hramezani requested a review from Kludex February 10, 2026 09:20
Comment thread tests/README.md.jinja Outdated
Comment on lines +43 to +45
> [!NOTE]
> If you are running a self-hosted Logfire instance, you should use the [Running Locally](#running-locally) section below
> to configure the MCP server with your custom base URL.
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's not what I mean... It should be possible to use the above on self hosted, isn't it not?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

@hramezani hramezani Feb 10, 2026

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we include it in helm chart, they can use it

Self-hosted customers have the MCP server in their own deployment,
so they should use their instance URL rather than running locally.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@hramezani hramezani merged commit 51caf30 into main Feb 10, 2026
5 checks passed
@hramezani hramezani deleted the hramezani/add-remote-mcp-docs branch February 10, 2026 12:16
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants