Skip to content

2025 12 06 deps#12

Merged
thedavidmeister merged 2 commits intomainfrom
2025-12-06-deps
Dec 6, 2025
Merged

2025 12 06 deps#12
thedavidmeister merged 2 commits intomainfrom
2025-12-06-deps

Conversation

@thedavidmeister
Copy link
Contributor

@thedavidmeister thedavidmeister commented Dec 6, 2025

Motivation

Solution

Checks

By submitting this for review, I'm confirming I've done the following:

  • made this PR as small as possible
  • unit-tested any new functionality
  • linked any relevant issues or PRs
  • included screenshots (if this involves a front-end change)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated build configuration to support Cancun EVM version
    • Updated Rain.solmem library dependency to latest version

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 6, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated foundry.toml to set EVM version to Cancun under the default profile, and bumped the rain.solmem submodule reference to a new commit. No behavioral or control flow changes introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Configuration Update
foundry.toml
Added evm_version = "cancun" to the default profile section.
Submodule Update
lib/rain.solmem
Updated submodule reference from commit c1c22cf to 228b35c.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title '2025 12 06 deps' is vague and generic, using a date format rather than describing the actual changes being made to the codebase. Replace the title with a clear, descriptive summary of the changes, such as 'Update EVM version to Cancun and bump Rain.solmem submodule' to better convey the purpose of these updates.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch 2025-12-06-deps

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2467e3b and eae2ae8.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • foundry.lock is excluded by !**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • foundry.toml (1 hunks)
  • lib/rain.solmem (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (3)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-test)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-legal)
  • GitHub Check: standard-tests (ubuntu-latest, rainix-sol-static)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
lib/rain.solmem (1)

1-1: This review comment is based on incorrect context; the flagged concerns do not apply to this change.

The file foundry.toml exists in the repository with evm_version = "cancun" already set (line 8), so it is available for review. The commit eae2ae8 shows the complete diff with 2,230 insertions across 35 files, including comprehensive test coverage with gas snapshots. The old commit hash referenced in the review (c1c22cf) does not exist in this repository's history.

This appears to be the initial commit of the rain.extrospection repository, not a submodule update to existing code. All changes are fully visible and documented in the git commit.

Likely an incorrect or invalid review comment.

foundry.toml (1)

8-8: PR description is empty and must be filled in before merging.

The evm_version = "cancun" configuration change is a routine update to a supported Foundry EVM target that is compatible with Solidity 0.8.25. However, the PR description needs to explain the motivation for this change. Fill in the template with:

  • Motivation: Why change to Cancun EVM?
  • Any relevant context or linked issues.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@thedavidmeister thedavidmeister merged commit 57b600f into main Dec 6, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant