Close stacked PR: No changes needed for nil message handling#266
Closed
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intomeling/252/refactor-legacy-send-recv-stream-interfacefrom
Closed
Close stacked PR: No changes needed for nil message handling#266Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intomeling/252/refactor-legacy-send-recv-stream-interfacefrom
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intomeling/252/refactor-legacy-send-recv-stream-interfacefrom
Conversation
Contributor
|
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
|
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Fix nil message handling in legacy SendMsg/RecvMsg
Close stacked PR: No changes needed for nil message handling
Feb 11, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This stacked PR was created to address a bot reviewer's claim that
proto.Marshal(nil)returns an error and suggested adding explicit nil handling inNewMessage. The maintainer correctly identified this as false.Resolution
No code changes required. The current implementation is correct:
proto.Marshal(nil)returnsnil, nilper protobuf specificationniltoNewMessageand succeedThe bot reviewer's concern was based on incorrect assumptions about protobuf's nil handling. This PR can be closed without merge.
💡 You can make Copilot smarter by setting up custom instructions, customizing its development environment and configuring Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Learn more Copilot coding agent tips in the docs.