Skip to content

Conversation

@rosano
Copy link
Member

@rosano rosano commented Oct 21, 2025

I assume this might be easier to run than the older version based on the comment below, but I haven't tested it.

untitaker/mysteryshack#74 (comment)

Hello, I updated mysteryshack to more up-to-date dependencies (see https://github.com/emembrives/mysteryshack/). If you want to merge back, feel free to do so. If your proposal of transferring the maintenance still applies, I would be happy to discuss.

Copy link
Contributor

@DougReeder DougReeder left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@raucao
Copy link
Member

raucao commented Oct 26, 2025

Do we know that we can trust that repo?

@rosano
Copy link
Member Author

rosano commented Oct 27, 2025

Do we know that we can trust that repo?

I had assumed you were green lighting it from the thread, but I guess you were calling for someone to review it? Will close…

@rosano rosano closed this Oct 27, 2025
@raucao
Copy link
Member

raucao commented Oct 27, 2025

I have contacted Etienne via email. Let's keep this open until we know about the current status of the fork.

@raucao raucao reopened this Oct 27, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants