Skip to content

Conversation

@by2waysprojects
Copy link

@by2waysprojects by2waysprojects commented Dec 9, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated internal team member permissions for code review and approval processes.

Note: This release contains no user-facing changes. This update is an internal administrative adjustment to development team structures.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Hi @by2waysprojects. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 9, 2025

Walkthrough

Adds by2waysprojects to the konflux-approvers and konflux-reviewers alias groups in the OWNERS_ALIASES file. This expands the membership of both approval and review teams to include the new member.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
OWNERS_ALIASES Configuration
OWNERS_ALIASES
Added by2waysprojects to konflux-approvers and konflux-reviewers alias lists

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

  • Update owners configuration #446: Modifies the same konflux-approvers and konflux-reviewers alias entries in OWNERS_ALIASES, with overlapping scope on alias management

Suggested labels

approved

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title mentions adding a new reviewer, but the changeset adds by2waysprojects to both konflux-approvers and konflux-reviewers lists. The title is partially accurate but omits the approver addition.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 9, 2025

The following users are mentioned in OWNERS file(s) but are untrusted for the following reasons. One way to make the user trusted is to add them as members of the rh-ecosystem-edge org. You can then trigger verification by writing /verify-owners in a comment.

  • by2waysprojects
    • User is not a member of the org. User is not a collaborator. Satisfy at least one of these conditions to make the user trusted.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b21d3e and 6fd852c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • OWNERS_ALIASES (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
OWNERS_ALIASES (1)

13-16: LGTM!

The addition of by2waysprojects to the konflux-reviewers list is properly formatted and maintains alphabetical order.

Comment on lines 5 to 12
konflux-approvers:
- abraham2512
- by2waysprojects
- fontivan
- rauhersu
- sabbir-47
- shajmakh
- yanirq
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🔴 Critical

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

gh api users/by2waysprojects --jq '{login: .login, name: .name, type: .type, created_at: .created_at}'

Repository: rh-ecosystem-edge/recert

Length of output: 192


🏁 Script executed:

curl -s https://api.github.com/users/by2waysprojects | jq '{login: .login, name: .name, type: .type, created_at: .created_at, message: .message}'

Repository: rh-ecosystem-edge/recert

Length of output: 192


🌐 Web query:

by2waysprojects github

💡 Result:

I couldn't find a GitHub user or repository named "by2waysprojects". Could you confirm the exact spelling or share a link/related project name to search for?


GitHub username 'by2waysprojects' does not appear to exist.

Cannot add a non-existent user to the OWNERS_ALIASES file. Verify the correct GitHub username spelling or confirm this is the intended account before merging. Adding invalid usernames to OWNERS configuration can cause configuration errors and prevents actual permission delegation.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In OWNERS_ALIASES around lines 5 to 12, the username 'by2waysprojects' appears
to be invalid; verify the correct GitHub username or remove it. Update the entry
with the correct, existing GitHub handle (or delete the line) so the
OWNERS_ALIASES only lists valid accounts, and re-run any OWNER validation checks
before merging.

@by2waysprojects
Copy link
Author

/cherrypick release-4.21
/cherrypick release-4.20
/cherrypick release-4.19
/cherrypick release-4.18
/cherrypick release-4.17
/cherrypick release-4.16
/cherrypick release-4.14

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@by2waysprojects: only rh-ecosystem-edge org members may request cherry picks. If you are already part of the org, make sure to change your membership to public. Otherwise you can still do the cherry-pick manually.

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick release-4.21
/cherrypick release-4.20
/cherrypick release-4.19
/cherrypick release-4.18
/cherrypick release-4.17
/cherrypick release-4.16
/cherrypick release-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@fontivan
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/ok-to-test

@omertuc
Copy link
Member

omertuc commented Jan 16, 2026

/approve

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 16, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: by2waysprojects, omertuc

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@danmanor
Copy link
Member

/retest

@danmanor
Copy link
Member

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-parallel ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-serial

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 18, 2026

@danmanor: Overrode contexts on behalf of danmanor: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-parallel, ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-serial

Details

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-parallel ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-serial

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Jan 18, 2026

@by2waysprojects: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-parallel 6fd852c link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-parallel
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-serial 6fd852c link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-single-node-recert-serial
ci/prow/baremetalds-sno-recert-cluster-rename 6fd852c link true /test baremetalds-sno-recert-cluster-rename

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants