Skip to content

Conversation

@abcxff
Copy link
Contributor

@abcxff abcxff commented Dec 11, 2025

No description provided.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Dec 11, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
rivetkit-serverless Error Error Dec 11, 2025 1:10am
3 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
rivet-cloud Ignored Ignored Dec 11, 2025 1:10am
rivet-inspector Ignored Ignored Preview Dec 11, 2025 1:10am
rivet-site Ignored Ignored Preview Dec 11, 2025 1:10am

Copy link
Contributor Author

abcxff commented Dec 11, 2025

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more


How to use the Graphite Merge Queue

Add the label merge-queue to this PR to add it to the merge queue.

You must have a Graphite account in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link.

An organization admin has enabled the Graphite Merge Queue in this repository.

Please do not merge from GitHub as this will restart CI on PRs being processed by the merge queue.

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@pkg-pr-new
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Dec 11, 2025

More templates

@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/cloudflare-workers@3623

@rivetkit/db

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/db@3623

@rivetkit/framework-base

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/framework-base@3623

@rivetkit/next-js

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/next-js@3623

@rivetkit/react

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/react@3623

rivetkit

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/rivetkit@3623

@rivetkit/sql-loader

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/sql-loader@3623

@rivetkit/engine-runner

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/engine-runner@3623

@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol

pnpm add https://pkg.pr.new/rivet-dev/rivet/@rivetkit/engine-runner-protocol@3623

commit: 2fc28aa

@claude
Copy link

claude bot commented Dec 11, 2025

Pull Request Review: Rivet Actors Lifecycle Testing

Summary

This PR introduces a comprehensive Rust-based test runner infrastructure for deep actor lifecycle testing. It replaces the previous TypeScript-based test runner with a pure Rust implementation, enabling better control over actor behavior simulation and lifecycle scenarios.

Changes: 21 files, +2813/-1059 lines


✅ Strengths

1. Excellent Architecture

  • Clean separation of concerns: actor.rs, behaviors.rs, protocol.rs, runner.rs
  • Well-designed trait-based actor system with TestActor trait
  • Flexible factory pattern for actor behaviors
  • Good use of channels for event and KV request handling

2. Comprehensive Test Coverage

The new tests cover critical lifecycle scenarios: actor creation, start timeouts, crash policies, graceful shutdown, input verification, and state transitions.

3. Better Test Reliability

  • Uses notification channels instead of arbitrary sleeps
  • Proper polling with timeouts instead of fixed delays
  • Clear actor behavior simulation via dedicated behavior structs

⚠️ Issues & Concerns

1. Critical: Debug Code in term_signal.rs:119

Debug log message "hello?" and commented-out code should be removed.

2. Empty File: actors_alarms.rs

Either remove this file or add a TODO comment explaining future plans.

3. Error Handling Concerns

  • Silent failures in ActorConfig when sending events (actor.rs:85)
  • Potential panics from mutex.expect() in behaviors.rs:75

4. Code Style Violations

From CLAUDE.md: Do not glob import from anyhow

Found in:

  • behaviors.rs:2
  • actor.rs:1
  • protocol.rs:1
  • runner.rs:2

Fix: Replace use anyhow::*; with use anyhow::{Result, Context, anyhow};

Also: Move inline import to top of file in runner.rs:184

5. Inconsistent Assertion (actors_lifecycle.rs:125)

Comment says "reschedule_ts is always Some(), not sure if this is intended" - needs clarification.

6. Potential Race Conditions

wait_ready() in runner.rs:240-247 has no timeout and could hang indefinitely.

7. Missing HTTP/WebSocket Implementation

Tests reference TODO comments about HTTP tunneling. Consider marking as #[ignore] or creating tracking issues.


🔒 Security

No major security issues found. The hardcoded token "dev" is fine for tests.


📋 Test Coverage

Well-Covered: Basic creation, input verification, timeouts, crash policies, shutdown

Missing: Actor alarms, HTTP/WebSocket tunneling, KV operations, error scenarios


📝 Recommendations

High Priority

  1. Fix debug code in term_signal.rs
  2. Fix anyhow glob imports in 4 files
  3. Address reschedule_ts assertion clarity
  4. Add timeouts to polling loops

Medium Priority

  1. Improve error handling with logging
  2. Remove or document actors_alarms.rs
  3. Standardize test naming

✨ Overall Assessment

This is a high-quality PR that significantly improves the testing infrastructure.

Verdict: Approve with Minor Changes Required

Score: 8.5/10

  • Architecture: 9/10
  • Code Quality: 8/10
  • Test Coverage: 9/10
  • Documentation: 8/10

Great work! 🚀

@abcxff abcxff requested a review from NathanFlurry December 11, 2025 02:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants