Conversation
Member
Author
|
Now it's failing everywhere, clearly I did something wrong. Happy to run the tests locally once I have more instructions 🙈 |
Member
Author
|
@quishqa friendly reminder 😸 |
Collaborator
|
Hi @maelle!
|
Member
Author
|
Don't hesitate to ping me to ask any question! |
Member
Author
|
@quishqa any help needed? 😸 |
Member
Author
|
@quishqa any update or help needed? 😸 |
Collaborator
Member
Author
|
Do you need to cache/mock some stuff? |
Member
Author
|
@quishqa any update / any help needed? |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
👋 @quishqa!
I don't know yet why the Windows build is failing (I am on Ubuntu and can't run the tests locally yet see #9) however I think this test file can be made more informative when it fails by using more specific expectations. Some of them might be new to you, I think going over https://testthat.r-lib.org/reference/index.html once in a while is useful as new expectations appear over time (it's useful for me at least!).
Anyway as a summary:
param_means["ws"] > 1 (actual) not equal to param_means["ws"] < 2 (expected)., usingexpect_lt()andexpect_gt()instead will give a clearer failure.expect_setequal()https://testthat.r-lib.org/reference/expect_setequal.html (it does not check the order of columns).