Skip to content

Conversation

chenyukang
Copy link
Member

Fixes #114484

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Aug 19, 2023

r? @TaKO8Ki

(rustbot has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Aug 19, 2023
@matthiaskrgr
Copy link
Member

@chenyukang
Copy link
Member Author

chenyukang commented Aug 19, 2023

#105249

Seems this is a regression case that we need fix from the root cause, instead of covering the errors.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

Also, this needs a very detailed explanation why it's correct. Adding a new fatal during codegen doesn't seem right, especially without the generic_const_exprs feature being enabled.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

This is an overflow error:

error: internal compiler error: compiler/rustc_monomorphize/src/collector.rs:723:54: collection encountered polymorphic constant: Unevaluated(UnevaluatedConst { def: DefId(0:31 ~ example[ba99]::virtualize_my_trait::{impl#0}::LEVELS), args: [VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<VirtualWrapper<SomeData<256>, 0>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>, 1>], promoted: None }, [*const (); 2])

So even if we are gonna fatally error here, the wording needs to explain that it's an overflow, not just "polymorphic".

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Sep 5, 2023

☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #115553) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts.

@chenyukang chenyukang closed this Oct 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Compiler panic on recursion limit finding the struct tail
6 participants